WarrenBuffduckh
About
- Banned
- Username
- WarrenBuffduckh
- Joined
- Visits
- 37
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 211
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 158
Reactions
Comments
-
scrutinizer789 said: Oh, look, more of the new "a reader's letter to which Tim Cook responds" genre, more decoy-ducks. Innovation, my ass! I have to inform you that - due to time constraints - the Apple Board has to select only subjects o…
-
adinoz said: First comment here, but doing so because Tim also replied to me. I'm not going to reveal what was said but I told him that after I'd moved to the other side of the world from my family I got an iPad for my elderly parents, one o…
-
Beats said: Who here is surprised? Jeff Bezos (if present)
-
mac_dog said: lam92103 Anti-trust cases are absolutely deserved. I should be able to decide what apps I install on MY phone, not Apple. You can put whatever apps you want on an android phone. It’s that simple. Thx for that excitin…
-
Beats said: WarrenBuffduckh said: Now that interaction with Tim Cook is possible, with a definite sign of product engagement from his side, may I advise him to make AppleWatch charging QI compatible. Advantage would be 5-fold: 1. Bette…
-
Now that interaction with Tim Cook is possible, with a definite sign of product engagement from his side, may I advise him to make AppleWatch charging QI compatible. Advantage would be 5-fold: 1. Better reliability and less placement sensitivity 2. …
-
castcore said: Xed said: I agree with him. Apple is a middleman to Epic's software. This is why I fully support Epic in creating their own game console so they can sell Forknife directly to customers the way Nintendo does on their Swit…
-
Rumor mills are supposed to agonize people to such extend that they gaspingly and whiningly, will take every iPhone that comes out before November even though it only supports only 3G and has the inevitable 6 design - milked until its inverse weight…
-
Oneclick: a proven solution to catch MacPro wheel orders that were mostly canceled upon check-out
-
Fortunately Tim Cook, a Man of his Principles, will never sacrifice privacy for lower level commercial interests. Read my lips...never (theless...)
-
Francules said: Honestly. Apple sucks. After over 10 years of using apple iphones and etc. i’m done. Goodbye. Oops - is Tim aware ? That might make the difference
-
The AppleCar project is there to prove us Cook is a product innovator. Also, to prove his successor he wasn’t (...) No, because unlike Watch and Airpods, we know Jobs had high interest in the car. We wouldn't know what was under Tim a…
-
mainyehc said: Objectively and geometrically speaking, the leaf design is way too similar and it’s on the same side. Also, its angle is similar, only mirrored. Apple does have a bit of a leg to stand on here, I’m afraid. And no, I’m not (jus…
-
lmasanti said: My real question is Why they put this profile now? (Other than blame Steve Jobs… preferred job of the WSJ.) And I did not read anything about the WSJ recognising that ‘we totally missed the point about Tim when he took the hel…
-
lkrupp said: Mr. Jobs, you chose well. Rest in peace. Your company is in good hands. It’s an unparallelled financial success, yet at denial of Steve’s principles (stay lean, mean, young, foolish, don’t focus on money, stay hungry, not satu…
-
lordjohnwhorfin said: If switching the Mac to AppleSilicon is not disruptive I don’t know what is. The amount of planning and flawless execution in a large number of areas is staggering. The article is also minimizing the AirPods when they ar…
-
YoctoYotta said: I'm not a Cook apologist by any means, but I think it's worth remembering that Apple have allegedly had at least two major, potentially market shattering projects very credibly rumored over the last decade; the car and the AR…
-
qwerty52 said: AppleInsider said: Also unlike Jobs, who thought Apple's cash was best directed toward research and development, Cook is much more willing to return cash to investors. For me, this is something, I would like to be opposite aro…
-
Oh, Apple did it again ! A new battery !! Upon full consideration of the battery component, its inner working, combined with intrinsic knowledge of the interaction with its peer electronic circuitry regulating all the energy requirements that the pa…
-
There is no Apple car, there will be no Apple car any time soon, and most probably there never will be one ever. Lots of these patents are just being filed with the idea to license them out to others - yet no single carmaker has yet shown interest. …