fezzasus
About
- Username
- fezzasus
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 36
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally posted by AgNuke1707 along with the theory that Apple will just name it Leopard. It's nice when your consumer base can refer to something by its code name, but call tech support at some time ... they'll ask you for a version nu…
-
Quote: Originally posted by gar Well, they'll screw it up if they follow your path and make a MacBook aimed for the so called "educational market". To tell the truth: worldwide the educational market for a iBook excists in the US only. Everyw…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Anders 1) Because its a mess that needs to be tailored to each application you want to use. 2) Because it doesn´t offer anywhere near the user experience Apple wants to present to its customers. 3) Because it isn…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Anders You would have to reverse engineer Xp to make it work. That would result in MAJOR lawsuits from MS. And when Vista is released you would have to start all over again. Bad bad idea. How does Wine get about…
-
Apple won't 'screw it up' however, 'screwing it up' would mean producing a competitor to their own MacBook Pro so the iBook replacement WILL feature the following: -intergrated graphics -lack of screen spanning -smaller feature list in gener…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Anders Oy. It would be much MUCH cheaper just to install a copy of Xp on every Mac than try to make that work without hick-ups. Perhaps, but this is the only way to ensure that Apple can appeal to all of the market…
-
Quote: Originally posted by mdriftmeyer First, Apple has legally gone on record to fully supporting PPC for Leopard. Secondly, the source trees aren't difficult to maintain. We did 4 CPU Architectures at NeXT and 2 at Apple isn't difficult. …
-
I may have written it poorly. I didn't mean windows virturalisation, consider it more of a windows replacement built into Leopard - the capacity to run windows programs without needing Windows XP - hence the need for there to be native support for w…
-
Quote: Originally posted by JavaCowboy The second link predicted, with stunning accuracy, that the iMac and the MacBook Pro would be introduced in January, with MacMini release in the "spring". The only thing the linked article was wrong about w…
-
Quote: Originally posted by addabox Man, what is it with the noobs vs. the mods, lately? I wouldn't say that, I raised an important point - although this new infomation on the spec of the ibook may be from a good source keep in mind that non…
-
Quote: Originally posted by fahlman Where, on a Mac mini, would you suggest they put an iSight? I considered this when posting, however volume wise a minimac is on par with an iBook and fitting an iSight into a MiniMac would be just as diffic…
-
Quote: Originally posted by TenoBell Yes it will. Apple is selling MacBooks to more than just education. They should however offer computers without iSight to those who need them that way. The MiniMac is similar spec and aimed at a similar…
-
Quote: Originally posted by theapplegenius I think most of that is wrong. My main reason for posting this was to invite inteligent discusion on the matter. But if you have nothing more to contribute, time will tell who is right.
-
I don't believe the iBook replacement will have an iSight camera - the main reason being the ibook has always been aimed at a laptop for education and with the current (in my opinion petty) views on cameras in schools, i doubt they would be availabl…