gambit
About
- Username
- gambit
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 475
Reactions
Comments
-
MacOS X has given you whiners something to complain about. How do you like dem Apples? (yes, that was a joke.)
-
[quote]Originally posted by low-fi: ?To get our developers even more excited, we?ll be giving them a sneak peek at the next release of Mac OS X, code named Poodle.? Hmmm... there's something about THAT codename that doesn't have the sa…
-
[quote]Originally posted by Lemon Bon Bon: I think that's the smartest comment I've heard somebody say on these boards regarding 'X'. It's a new way of working. No offense to Man-at-Arms, but that's been said once or twice before.
-
[quote]Originally posted by preston: 10.2 is going to suck... new handicap features (will never use), some diskcopy crap? will never use. SMB Browser? well yes, that would be good, but not for CAN$50. The only thing I would pay for is DR…
-
It COULD be the fact that 7.6 was the buggiest, most unstable OS Apple had released in years. That, coupled with the fact that MacOS 8 was already being touted as THE upgrade to get, 7.6 just wasn't worth the $119.99 it cost. Apple's point-update t…
-
"Fat tabby." lol
-
[quote]Originally posted by Junkyard Dawg: Uh, I meant to say that I expect 10.2 at MWNY, not MWSF. I'll be surprised if it's out any sooner. But I think the wait will be worth it for sure...the Mac OS X team has had more time to work on 10.2 tha…
-
[quote]Originally posted by Clive: Gambit, I'm sorry of say this, but you're an outright arsehole. I never wrote anywhere that MacOS X sucks. What I wrote, several times, in several ways is that it's not ready for me, on the desktop, yet. And…
-
What's there to be wrong about? SCSI support is lacking in OS X. Listen, the ONLY one who's being black and white about things is you, Clive. We're saying OS X is awesome and we agree it's a work in progress. You're saying OS X outright sucks be…
-
[quote]Originally posted by Mac Guru: [QBNot saying you're wrong for using Quark it's just that it seems you are using the same blanket arguments for Adobe migrating to X as you are for X itself... use em, know em THEN talk. [/QB] heh. I'm star…
-
Clive: you reply to my post without reading all of it, which addressed and explained a lot of what you wanted, and then you get mad when you're labeled 'ignorant.' You're not ignorant because of your opinion, Clive. You're ignorant because you blas…
-
Okay guys, someone write back. Tell me I'm wrong, or that I'm an idiot, or something! Just don't let all that I wrote go to waste or else I'm never posting again!! Here me?? NEVER!!!!
-
Oh yea: and I'm spent.
-
I'm gonna be straight up honest with you, Clive, so don't think I'm being mean. The more I read your posts, the more you confirm you know nothing about MacOS X. I would actually like to say that reading your posts are actually frustrating with all…
-
[quote]Originally posted by M3D Jack: was mentioned by someone in another post who summed it up best. To paraphrase: If you treat Mac OS X like a replacement for Mac OS 9 (that is, think of it as just another upgrade) you're going to hate it, and …
-
Actually, I remember after X.1 came out, during an interview, one of the Apple higheer-ups said there's still room for another speed boost along the lines of 10 --> 10.1. No, I don't have a link, but I clearly remember reading that exact sta…
-
Can't we all agree that Finder has issues, one way or another? It doesn't matter why anymore because in a month or two it'll be fixed: Railhead Design: Another 10.2 Seed Released Another seed of Apple?s next major OS upgrade has been made av…
-
AirSluf: (what does that MEAN, anyway?) Won't putting more 'funnels' into the kernal make the kernal more open to crashes? The less you have accessing the kernal the more stable the kernal theoretically is. Right?
-
[quote]Originally posted by AirSluf: We know what happened to then, don't we? Ummm..... they made Office:mac v.X?
-
Hark! Hear the ignorant speak! [ 03-19-2002: Message edited by: Gambit ]