camimac
About
- Username
- camimac
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 54
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by extremeskater Small features? Stayed on schedule?.. I have read alot of your posts and i have come to the conclusion that if Steve Jobs took a shit in a brown bag and tagged it the iDump you would find a reason to say …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by roehlstation They don't want a rash of AirPorts dying, I've burned out Airports in the past from transmittin too much through them. I think it'll be back, there was probably a few bugs they couldn't live with. I do…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by JasonD HELLO??? Read this (and other) posts...there is a hack to get it to work. That's not the point, do you know many people who will bother? Isn't the whole idea of the Mac that "it just works" (even though that…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Leonard Big deal! So Apple yanked one or two small (and I do mean SMALL) sub-features before release. Maybe it had some problems and wasn't ready. Would you rather have the feature and lose data? I think Apple's don…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hohlecow Is Apple able to include these additional features and still comply with Sarbanes Oxley? Pardon my ignorance, but what exactly does the Sarbanes-Oxley Act got to do with this?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by JeffDM Not only were the secret features yanked, we get several announced ones yanked too. Yeah, way to go Apple!!! Start selling a product and THEN remove features from it!! It's like ordering a car and between the…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Takeo macosrumors.com has an article about a forthcoming "Mac Nano" to replace the Mac Mini. http://www.macosrumors.com/ Ha! Do you actually believe anything they say? If this ad-galore site gets anything right i…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by physguy No, he (or she) is someone who actually reads and understands what is being said. As I've said elsewhere Apple had been amazingly transparent in what they have been doing with the iPhone. They've said they we…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by coolfactor Apple has clearly stated, in public, that AppleTV is a "hobby" right now. That's confirmation that they are working on it, but not devoting all of their resources to it. It's not a "hobby", it's just anot…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by melgross You don't have to agree, but it's his product, not yours. Actually that's the problem with most of the things that Apple releases: it's like the products are made for Jobs, not the general public. That's a …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by coolfactor You'll notice I didn't say it wasn't _possible_ for the iPhone (or iPod touch) to support applications. There are hundreds available today. What I did say was (paraphrasing myself) "when Apple was in a _posi…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by coolfactor Nowhere have they said that it's a PDA or general-purpose computing platform. Sure, it would be nice if native apps were supported out of the gate, but most people really don't have a clue just how complex t…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Avor As for the actual issue of 1 million: it isn't Apple's job to fund your development. Apple already solved this problem for Steam and any other program that does not run on OSX - Boot Camp. Is it the perfect soluti…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ouragan While Intel will launch Quad-core Extreme edition Penryn desktop processors on November 11, 2007, it will wait until January 2008 to launch mainstream Penryn Quad-core desktop processors destined for iMacs (wit…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by mrtotes Macosrumours .. an even more unreliable source is reporting that the Mac Mini is to be replaced by the Mac Nano in the coming weeks. That would surely leave room in the desktop line up for an xMac. Oh…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by emig647 Am I still spiteful @ m$ stealing Bungie from the world? Yes. Am I still spiteful @ Bungie for accepting the deal and turning their backs on macs? Yes. They should have known this would happen when deali…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by vinea The US console market was $4.8B in 2006. The US PC game market was $970M in 2006. The market disagrees that PC games are better than console games. Just because the console market outsells the PC game mark…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by pomo Being a gamer doesn't equal to someone who plays oregon trail on a PC. (I miss that game ). You forget that most computers are used in offices. That does not represent your average consumer let alone PC gamers…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by deanbar If you think people specifically buy a Mac to play games on, you're nuts. Horses for courses, as another poster said, why splash out on a specced out PC when you could buy a PS3 for a fraction of the price, or …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by pomo You are so naive to think that there are more PC gamers than Mac users. How's this....Prove it. He doesn't need to prove something that is obvious to anyone who has a clue. I'm sorry, but it's the simple tru…