jragosta
About
- Username
- jragosta
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 10,473
Reactions
Comments
-
kasakka wrote: » The article doesn't really say what is an acceptable range here. Just that Android tablets have slower response, whether that is due to subpar hardware or software issues. Acceptable means 'doesn't have a lag that's noticeable …
-
apple ][ wrote: » A larger 13" iPad would be cool, I have no objections against that, but screw the notebook part. Leave it as an iPad, large and super thin, with an even bigger screen! I think that there is definitely a market of people who would…
-
macxpress0660 wrote: » Yes, its just you. That was a Steve Jobs thing...I doubt there will be any "One more thing" anymore in Apple's lifetime. Well, it used to be a Steve Jobs thing. Now it's a Samsung thing.
-
stylorouge wrote: » My sensory is just fine. Lol. So it's your brain that's damaged?
-
jordon eagan wrote: » The liberals who hate Fox News do so for two reasons...#1. Fox is the top cable news outlet..by a HUGE margin...Bill O'Reilly probably gets more viewers for his show than any CNN, MSNBC, Al Jazera and PBS shows combined! And …
-
stylorouge wrote: » Really? Get your facts straight before you dismiss everything as garbage. I own an iPad and a nexus 7 and the nexus is an amazing machine faster than iPad 4 with iOS 7. The specs are more than double than the iPad. Yes yes I ge…
-
jungmark wrote: » I think it still needs to be based on the earth's orbit so we can compare year to year. So why is it more important to follow the earth's revolution around the sun so that we can track year to year than to follow the earth's r…
-
richard getz wrote: » Nice try to you as well. The case, if you read it, stated that they lawsuit against FoxNews as to their ability to fire someone based on the plaintiff using a FCC regulation that was not law. You can't state you were protecte…
-
sockrolid wrote: » 2014 MacBook Air: quad-core A8, no Intel Tax (r). Not a chance. Apple will not release a product that is dramatically slower than its predecessor. An iPad convertible (what I've been calling an 'Ipad Pro' for the year or m…
-
richard getz wrote: » Wow, more FoxNews hater link bait! Please, anytime you can show a lie, just post it here. I fully understand you don't like the opinions of @FoxNews and that's fine, but the news reporting is spot on and very informationa…
-
ericthehalfbee wrote: » Doesn't matter. What Apple really gains from this is that Samsung has had to (yet again) modify its devices to avoid infringement. Even if no devices actually get banned Apple still wins as Samsung had to make changes. A…
-
andysol wrote: » Have you replaced your 2 thermostats with Nest Thermostats yet jrag? And are you going to replace your 2 smoke detectors with these? Nope. I may be moving soon and don't see any reason to put money into the house.
-
brians wrote: » No one else is charging $830 for a cell phone. Most manufacturers charging >$600 delivers a far more sophisticated phone than what Apple does. Nonsense. The iPhone as a 64 bit processor. Motion sensor. Integral fingerprin…
-
zroger73 wrote: » In my case, my home requires only one thermostat for a total of $250, but five smoke detectors for a total of $645 (local codes dictate that a typical 3-bedroom, single-story home requires five detectors). Not everyone is like…
-
frood wrote: » I don't see them bypassing it, just adding to it. Samsung adds a proprietary variant to its phones as an 'add-on' to the 5g standard. Phones work with 'standard' 5g carriers. Phone is 4x faster if you choose a carrier that has …
-
damn_its_hot wrote: » I love the idea but I think the price will sink it. Really too bad. If $250 didn't sink the thermostat, I'm not sure why $129 would sink a smoke detector.
-
irving muller wrote: » Don't weather men use screens behind them by just stepping to the side? I would imagine they would try to use them the same way. It's clumsy when weathermen do it, too. They're frequently turning away from the audience an…
-
jamesmac wrote: » Apparently, Google is working on it and some are even speculating that Kit Kat may be 64 bit. You won't like my answer, but I suspect that no one else introduced 64 bit support because it's not really necessary, and it's a bit o…
-
frood wrote: » Good call. The only reason to veto this would have been to offset the prior veto in Apple's favor. That veto basically a result of having to allow SEP patents to actually have some clout, which could have shifted the patent landsc…
-
akqies wrote: » I see your point but is it really good use of technology and way for viewers to obtain info that you place in the background various angled displays partially obscured by people sitting in front of them that viewers need to read? W…