harleighquinn
About
- Username
- harleighquinn
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 303
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody I like your take on this Robin but perhaps you are being just a bit *too* kind to the Gizmodo kids. This part here for instance: Doesn't seem right to me. Gizmodo's first publication on the matt…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta The point that Gizmodo (and you) are missing is that it doesn't matter if it's authentic. Gizmodo knew that Hogan didn't own it. That makes it theft under CA law. The fact that Gizmodo paid $5 K for it makes i…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by CurtisEMayle Alternative Perspective 1. FWIW HQ, from my assessment, on this Gizmodo topic and specifically the referenced post, PP is not engaging in any misdirection, classically or otherwise. Your interpretation(…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Robin Huber Let me wade in as a neutral party. I think there are things we can all agree on. I just read the entire affidavit. Also went to Gizmodo.com and watched the now infamous video as well as read their side o…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody If anyone is tired of reading the loose thoughts and hateful remarks of "harley" here, there is a new interesting development. Ryan Tate of Gawker got in an email fight with Steve Jobs and posted the…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Energ8t Yes and no. Chen is a big boy and he knowingly took a shady back-alley approach to "journalism". He should be hung out to dry along with anyone else who acted unethically and more so unwisely. Furthermore, I am…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tipt Sigh. I'd rather not give you a treatise in law right now. So let's just assume that just because I am summarizing things for the sake of this thread, doesn't mean it's the entire statement on the law ok? In …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 How much do you want to bet? Chen was videotaped in possession of property deemed to be stolen, he admitted he had it in his possession, nowhere did I say he stole it. I suggest you look into the differenc…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tipt I have for the most part ignored your posts, but I do have a question. Do you know much about agency law? Corporate criminal liability? Criminal law? Anything of a legal nature? The rules that say that corporation…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 So a video showing Chen in possession of an object deemed to be stolen property does not show Chen in possession of it. I see. Ignorance of the law is no defence. And in your case ignorance is your only…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 Yes, you are quite welcome to go through all my posts and see where I said Chen publicly admitted to purchasing stolen property a crime under Californian law, in itself a criminal act deserving of investigation.…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Wil He's from Germany . Anyway, now we went down to two people equating posters as either supporting Nazis and the Gestapo or are Stalin like in air brushing their posts. Honestly, you guys are a damn joke. Dan2236, if…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by macnyc I'm sorry but I agree with him. Apple has $40 billion in the bank because they know what they are doing. You have no clue whether the guy works in IT or not. Anyway that's irrelevant. I defer to Steve Jobs…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by mobycat I'd rather you didn't bother. You're clueless, obviously. I was talking about Chen reporting ON it. Perhaps YOU are the one that needs remedial English. (It's capitalized, by the way.) Learn to read. N…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Robin Huber It's not Lamb, it's Lam. Glass houses and all that. Automatic spell check. iPhone.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody Or ... After accusing me in public of saying something, you might want to elaborate on exactly what it is that I'm supposed to have said? I'm not sure what you're even talking about here, in that …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by mobycat It's not ludicrous. I'm talking about CRIMINAL charges. A crime is a crime, no matter how you try to spin it. If you were talking CIVIL liabilities, then yes... Domino's would be the one to deal with it, as …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta You keep saying that, but so far, you've never been able to find any flaws in the analogy. I guess 'ludicrous' means that you're either not bright enough to understand something or you understand it and don't …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by justflybob And you know this because you own a company with $40 billion in cash? More than likely he knows this because he is either an IT admistrator or a director of Technology, or a COO of a corporation.....and …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Robin Huber A couple of clueless dudes decide to turn a happy accident into a quick few grand. Not realizing that they are a pair of chihuahuas getting into the arena with a pit bull. A little like Mamet's "American Bu…