johndoe98
About
- Username
- johndoe98
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 278
Reactions
Comments
-
charlituna wrote: » Something tells me that there won't be one. Or an iLife '13, '14 etc. Such a thing generally comes with having to pay again. Not very cx friendly when they could drop the yearly numbering, go for frequent, small updates and we …
-
Are we forgetting that since day #1 Apple has claimed it isn't concerned with the price when designing its computers? Rather they want to build the best machines possible for their intended purpose, yet here we are with people complaining that Apple…
-
charlituna wrote: » Ram in the tech specs is not listed as user accessible. Warranty t&c covers the rest But hey, you go buy a 21.5, shove in your own ram and then take it to Apple for a repair and see what happens. It doesn't have to say …
-
gwmac wrote: » Have you ever gone to an automobile dealer's parts store? I can remember having to buy a rear tail light assembly. Cost from dealer was $295.00. Same assembly from a NAPA store or from an internet parts store was just about half of …
-
island hermit wrote: » You should consider that iFixit gave the 21.5 iMac a 3 out of 10 for repairability. [... and I'd like to know how the f*ck the fact that iFixit makes my point any less relevant] Hermit, tell me, what would you realisti…
-
macinthe408 wrote: » I was going to buy myself a Porsche Cayman, but discovered it was very difficult to access the engine/drivetrain. I bought a Toyota Yaris instead, because, you know, self-repairability is right next to performance and quality …
-
gwmac wrote: » Not being able to upgrade RAM wouldn't be that big of a deal if Apple didn't rape you on RAM upgrade prices. Do they really need to charge about 2x retail value on RAM for the 21"? They include 8GB but want to charge $200 for an ext…
-
island hermit wrote: » As I said... the number of people who will be willing to take off the display, remove the motherboard and void the warranty to replace/ install some ram makes the point that its user replaceable irrelevant. What makes you…
-
charlituna wrote: » The ram on the 21.5 is listed as non user serviceable which makes doing it a warranty void. Do you have a source for this claim? I haven't looked at the warranty for these new machines, but frankly I'd be rather surprised if t…
-
charlituna wrote: » Not necessarily. Skype won the issue in part because it has or at least had, a text feature and an audio call feature both of which directly compete with AT&T offerings. That you had to download it is moot. The key featur…
-
franco borgo wrote: » You are right If FaceTime could do audio only, which would be easier on the network, then it would be Clear that AT&T blocked similar service. My Guess is that Apple never offer this iChat Feature because of the talk …
-
Good riddance. I'd much prefer to stay in Safari to view the content. Now if only Apple would let us delete some of the other useless Apps that some of us don't use, like Stocks, Weather, Game Center, Newstand. IMO these should be optional installs.
-
Breaking my earlier claim to not post anymore with this exception (I don't think it'll) happen again. Samsung's Motion to Strike can be read here: http://www.groklaw.net/pdf3/ApplevSamsung-1549.pdf
-
gazoobee wrote: » Your quite clearly wrong about that. Read the article again. She hasn't ruled on Quinn's actions only on Samsung's reaction to Apple's request for censure/closure. Ok. I'll grant maybe I'm reading too much into it. I prese…
-
gazoobee wrote: » Actually no. Only a complete idiot would think there were no grounds for sanctions. There are probably no grounds for the sweeping sanctions Apple asked for, and no cause to just call the trial "over" and won by Apple, but …
-
sennen wrote: » You didn't say the same thing at all. Koh said nothing about the definitions of "public" and "open", she simply ruled that the actions of Samsung's legal team didn't require the kind of measures that Apple was calling for. No sh…
-
jragosta wrote: » Really? When Samsung has already received sanctions FOUR TIMES in this trial? Yep, they really schooled the judge. You might want to learn to read. The judge said that Samsung has shown good cause for their motion to discard Ap…
-
jigjag69 wrote: » Just as Samusng said, this would assume the jury has ALREADY violated the Court's instructions making the jury botched anyways. Don't be an iSheep and selectively read what you want to heat. Don't say that around here, you wi…
-
Wow, judge Koh said that Quinn showed good cause for his actions. Based on all the flak I took in the other thread for saying pretty much the same thing, I guess all the people there probably think that Koh doesn't know the difference between the te…
-
muppetry wrote: » You are flogging a dead horse here. You really do appear to be confusing (or, I suspect, pretending to confuse) excluded evidence with sealed judicial records, which are the actual subject of Koh's order. The former (obviously) …