mrshow
About
- Username
- mrshow
- Joined
- Visits
- 25
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 48
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 165
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TheWhiteFalcon I'm glad I get to add you to my blocked list. Funny how the guy who thinks we live in a dictatorship doesn't want to hear dissenting opinions.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by echosonic If Hitler had promoted his new Jewish Community Centers, and offered free train rides for the whole family, he would have been about as intellectually and verbally honest as the filthy communist pigs who co…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Yeah, that’s you. Care to actually refute anything I’ve presented, then? You haven't presented anything but hot air.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by EWTHeckman So instead of going back and dealing with the specific arguments, you just keep the ad hominem fallacy going. Here's a hint: demonizing the "other side" is not a valid argument. But demonizing demo…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil The most depressing thing about this isn’t the ruling. It’s that people have been deluded into thinking the ruling is the opposite of what it is. No; you listen because he’s right. Yeah, that…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by EWTHeckman They ADMITTED it! http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/14/read-the-inspector-general-report-on-the-irs-scandal/ As for the arguments, go back and read for comprehension. The ev…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by EWTHeckman And yet, not a single person has responded to my real arguments. Other real arguments made by others here have been equally ignored or gainsaid. (For example, the government's proven use of the IRS to su…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by EWTHeckman I think somebody here doesn't understand that name calling (ad hominem attack) is known to be an invalid substitute for an actual argument. Or would you prefer that I answer in kind? I think what w…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TheWhiteFalcon More flippant responses from those that are against the FCC ruling.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by lkrupp Now the government can prevent your freedom of speech. Just like television networks, your ISP can be fined if you type the word **** in this forum. Your criticism of Al Sharpton could be labeled hate speech…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TheWhiteFalcon Oh, to be a simpleton... After reading some of your posts, I think that would be a step up for you.
-
Title II is all about common carrier status. Cable television, broadcast radio, and broadcast television are not common carriers, and Title II does not give the FCC either the requirement or permission to fine or censor obscene content. Neither does…
-
Wow the crazies and corporate shills are out strong today. The little guy, future tech startups, and freedom won today.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by krreagan Sooo you want to leave it in the hands of a monopolistic ISP's to decide what you can and cannot see/hear? Ya that'll be in our best interest! NOT! Tallest Skil is either an astroturfer or is seriou…
-
Here come the astroturfing trolls and Obama haters.
-
Yes! A win for freedom and ensuring a chance of success by future tech startups.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by muppetry Net Neutrality is just a set of proposed regulations to prevent traffic prioritization at the whim of the ISPs. How on earth are you managing to conflate that with "a massive government program" that requi…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Which makes it all the more amazing that you still can’t comprehend that I wasn’t the one to make the assocation. Yeah, sorry, already proved you wrong. Just because you say you did doesn't make …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Benjamin Frost And you're against a free market and an advocate for low speeds for all. Net Neutrality ensures a free and fair market. Great now the 'free market' people are out.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Benjamin Frost I couldn't disagree more. I would welcome an ISP that prioritised traffic to iTunes at the expense of file sharing sites. Then you're against Net Neutrality, and you're ok with a censored inte…