hellacool
About
- Username
- hellacool
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 759
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by bullhead they already have this...it is called Genius. And they do featured apps where they highlight different cool apps. Not sure what you people want. it is like you want apple to magically know e…
-
I like the way the Amazon app store is set up, they give away one paid app free a day. I discover many great apps that way basically because I am getting free exposure to a company I otherwise may never have heard of or thought of. I get the fre…
-
chadmatic wrote: » It is in that context. If the shoe fits it is, if not it is a fuzzy animal, either way you lose.
-
enature wrote: » One can only hope that the limo-iPhone rumors is just a decoy, and Apple will not regurgitate the now stale design with all its shortcomings (easily breakable due to its impractical glass-steel construction and the narrow screen).…
-
chadmatic wrote: » Oh I get it! You take a derogatory word and put the letter "i" in front of it... Clever! Right because the word sheep is known around the world as derogatory.
-
jason98 wrote: » 4SS ? Then they will sue Chevy for using SS on their cars claiming it was their idea first.
-
badflounder wrote: » You don't think this will sell well huh. LOL Sorry for the laugh but, all due respect, that is a ridiculous take. I think it looks great but then again I don't care about having the biggest screen or most megapixels or wh…
-
studentx wrote: » Outselling if you mean "shipped" vs. "sold". The press is full of idiots. Keep hanging on too your 5 year old argument, it will match your new 5 year old looking iPhone 5.
-
tallest skil wrote: » Are you people freaking kidding me? Do you really think that after over a year of saying this that it means anything at all? The beginning of the end is never evident until the end is near and everyone asks, "what happened…
-
genovelle wrote: » If I don't have an account with Amazon and don't want one because I don't like or trust them, should the author/publisher lose my business because the only game in town is Amazon. By selling my book below cost, other ebook stor…
-
mechanic wrote: » Lots of flaws here in your argument. Amazon's current pricing is 30% cut and 70% to the publisher, then they add fees for a lot of other things and pretty soon your down to about 60% to amazon and 40% to the publisher. Then le…
-
quadra 610 wrote: » MS "saved" Apple because Apple had them over a barrel. MS, as usual in those days, was caught with their hand in the cookie jar. Caught with Apple's Quicktime code. Before they stole that, movies and other video wouldn't pl…
-
lkrupp wrote: » Oh bullshit! The Mac was still entrenched in the graphic arts, desktop publishing, and advertising markets. Yeah, .00001% of .01% is not entrenched, keep dreaming. They are hardly scratch 8% now, 15 years later.
-
suddenly newton wrote: » Riiight. Microsoft was in the "drivers seat." And what did it get them except a strong competitor wielding the iPod, iMac, iTunes, iPhone, and iPad? None of which existed in 1997, good anology, not. Is there a genius r…
-
just_me wrote: » Microsoft invested in apple and declared future support to its mac office suite to instill confidence not only to investors but users as well. Did this save apple? Most will argue yes. Others don't The investment didn't save A…
-
doh123 wrote: » Apple wasn't bailed out... here is a good description of what really happened. http://www.zdnet.com/blog/apple/stop-the-lies-the-day-that-microsoft-saved-apple/7036 You may want to not scroll past the first twenty Google resu…
-
quadra 610 wrote: » They didn't bail out Apple. Apple bailed themselves out, with court backing, using Microsoft's money. You may want to pull your head out of the sand and do a little research. I know you hate anything not Apple but Google is …
-
quadra 610 wrote: » Don't worry. Many more are to follow. I am sure if they get desperate, they can use all that cross licensing they acquired when the bailed Apple so many years ago.
-
grumblegus wrote: » Yeah, cause these guys have such a great track record when they get involved with industries, especially involving new technology. New technology always disrupts older ones that address similar needs but it doesn't always elim…
-
anonymouse wrote: » That's just about the dumbest possible approach that could be suggested: Firmly establish one company in a monopoly position and by doing so destroy an industry, then break up the only player left after the irreversible damage …