ski1
About
- Username
- ski1
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 251
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism No where in the paragraph I noted did he stated did he state that the iPhone 4 was only superior to the 3GS in reception when the Bumper was in use. I’ve already debunked, decimated and destroyed every other …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism No where in the paragraph I noted did he stated did he state that the iPhone 4 was only superior to the 3GS in reception when the Bumper was in use. I’ve already debunked, decimated and destroyed every other …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism According to ski1’s argument it’s when "held wrong" that the iPhone 4 is even more superior to the other phones as the difference in dB is lessened and the iPhone 4 will be able to hold a call at −120 dB whil…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism And yet it can still hold a call a much lower dB level than any other phone tested. Sounds to me like you are trying to force some anti-Apple agenda despite the very evidence that showed the iPhone 4’s additi…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism Your right, it was the 3GS that would drop a call at -113 dB while the iPhone 4 would hold a call at -120 dB. So the logic isnt’ flawed, just my previous data. This new data works out better as it means that …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism What’s interesting about that dropped bars when cupped, which maxed out at 24 dB according to AnandTech, is that the new design can hold a call so much better than the old design that even with that extra dro…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse So, explain why, if the signal drops, it matters whether the antenna is internal or external, when what's measured is the same phenomenon. Oh, right, it doesn't matter because it's the same phenomenon. Th…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Dr Millmoss If it wasn't obvious already, you're wasting your time. We already know that from his point of view, if you don't agree with him, you are an idiot and you are not rational. LOL, so true !!! I guess I am…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse We've all seen the video of this happening. They thing about the external antenna is a straw man. Why does it matter if the antenna is internal or external when the signal drops? It doesn't, it's the same ef…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse It's not, it's next to worthless, an artifact of an age where information was hard to come by and people were desperate for little charts that told them what to buy. They are really nothing but a carefully c…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse Yes, that's exactly the point. No one is actually testing to verify this on other phones, least of all Consumer Reports. So, what does that tell you about the value of their testing? You are the one thats…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse Consumer Reports simply is not a reliable reviewer of any product. That's your opinion. Many people think otherwise. I think Consumer Reports is a valuable tool, along with other resources to help with …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse Which other phones did Consumer Reports test for that phenomenon? Oh, none? That's exactly the point, how can you 'ding' one phone for something you didn't even test other phones for. However, the Samsung Ga…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anonymouse Obviously, they weren't testing antennas on any phones, or they would have noticed this issue previously, on any number of phones. Uhh, name one other phone that loses 24 db simply by touching one small s…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism 1) AnandTech proves that attenuation occurs with other phones when you grip it, thus destroying your argument in your first link. Did you even read the article. AnandTech showed the iPhone4 has far worse …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism You really have to not think when you write if you can’t even remember writing this: And here's three independent links to back my point. AnandTech: http://www.anandtech.com/show/3821/i...1-signal-fix…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism I’m referring to your unsubstantiated, blanket claim. So us proof! You may be right, but your argument is weak. Claim to what ? Be more specific. Wherever I said that statement, it was referring to somet…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism so your counterargument to back up your claim of "most independent experts disagree” is that it’s "common sense and simple logic”? Awesome¡ What exactly are you referring to with the "most independent expe…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by souliisoul Here is great comment "most independent experts disagree" LINK the data to show this is the case. You really want me to believe you. I read all your comments and you would give any headache with your pos…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta That would have been insane. Even with photos and a description of their $100 M test lab and photos and videos of lots of other phones doing the same thing, people are still accusing Apple of lying. If A…