macadamias
About
- Username
- macadamias
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 66
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Asherian I fully expect the iPod/iPhone to never support WebM, though, because Apple is pushing h264 hard as they're part of the patent pool for it. Sites will need to maintain both h264 and WebM versions to hit all cl…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Erunno Interesting. Can you link to the technical explanation? I haven't had the time to occupy myself with this topic deeply yet. One link I found is here: The first in-depth technical analysis of VP8 http://x264d…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by dan2236 Are you all too much of Apple fanboys to realize what a damn snitch that roommate is? Seriously, I would NEVER call the cops on my roommate unless he killed someone. Capital crimes are NO crimes to betray your …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Hellacool Or maybe proof of ownership. Just because it has an Apple logo on it doesn't make it Apple's. If I lost my iPhone and someone found it and someone other than me tried to claim it I would hope the person who…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by clickmyface What site? The only people to report on the direct contact with Apple was Gizmodo, who never once reported that Steve Jobs personally called them. I don't get why people (aka you) feel the need to make …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by err You can't fore sure say it is only for "the latest android". If the API's are there, and the phone is good enough (and most android phones are), they might be able to support flash... I can't really agree that m…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by err The question is, were they allowed to? They are allowed to try to develop whatever they wish. I'm sure they know how to jailbreak an iPhone. They just can't release it unless they can convince Apple that Jobs is…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Groovetube oh now you're going to tell us adobe is a criminal. First we heard that adobe is against choice and is forcing you, to something, not sure what, and now we're comparing them to a criminal. Well certainly …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Groovetube swf has been open for time. Anyone can develop their own player, in fact the compiler for actionscipt is open source. The FULL swf spec is NOT open. One of the things that open source players can't access…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Groovetube that isn't rue based on adobe's recent -public- beta of flash player for mac, which runs extremely well. If a criminal reforms, does that erase all of his past crimes? Adobe's recent work on the Mac versi…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by chronster LOL! Good article. Things are heating up between the two companies. I personally see merit in both sides, but what I don't think is wise is for Steve to have dismissed flash as a possibility in the futur…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by yesiCan ??? Meanwhile Steve Jobs' Disney website it chock full of FLASH. Which is perfectly browsable on the iPhone/iPad. They just redirect you to a version that doesn't need flash to operate. Just like ANY decent …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by freddych I really think it's a stretch to say that Gizmodo "stole" the iPhone and this is why: Gizmodo had every intention of returning the iPhone to Apple once they got their hands on it. This can be shown in that …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by caljomac I realy don't know what all the fuss is about - if apple employees leave iphones on seats, then it is good to try and contact them (which they did) they then gave (sold) it to giz, who then looked at it, and a…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism As I stated, none of this affects me so I can't get emotional and want to see Chen ass raped in prison or whatever sick perversion some people might have against Gizmodo. Also, none of this is as serious p…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hmurchison I see things from both sides here. The burden of proof lies with California to prove that Gizmodo knew the item was stolen and also prove that Gizmodo/Gawker media should not have the same protections an…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ktappe Oh really? Apparently you're unable to put 2 + 2 together and realize how dangerous a precedent this is for our free media. If the rich (Steve Jobs) can influence the police to raid the homes of his enemies, eve…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DaveGee http://www.ehow.com/how_5137713_buy-...s-legally.html If the stolen goods are not claimed from the police, they EVENTUALLY sell the goods at auction. By this time of course, anybody will be able to buy a com…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tulkas No, but the same conditions to the trade secret laws apply. By removing it from the Apple facilities, the are no longer taking necessary steps top protect it. Umm. They went to great lengths to disguise it as…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by freddych Do you think that Gizmodo paid the money before they could get their hands on the device and figure out that it was real? How is it in any way a criminal act if Giz intended to return the device to Apple? U…