os10geek
About
- Banned
- Username
- os10geek
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 413
Reactions
Comments
-
Spooky...your unbased pessimism is really getting on my nerves Just stop with it!
-
I noticed something...the laptop weighs in at 2.5 pounds WITHOUT the extra battery. It probably weighs 4 with it. That is some tricksy, decietful marketing.
-
I have been thinking about this, and I hope that I am right. This is what should happen: 1. The iBook gets a 9" super-high resolution display. 2. The Gobi is adopted on the iBook. 3. OS 10.3 "Panther" has vecor-based graphics. 4.The iPod HDD…
-
mmzmzmmmzzmmzzmzzzzzzzzzzzzmmmm Panther zzzmmzmzmmzmmmmmmmmz By the way, this is a Centrino thread, not a Apple Invented Firewire, so they R cool thread. [ 03-14-2003: Message edited by: os10geek ]
-
That brings up my question (kinda) : Is the 1.42 ghz G4 in the current lineup the fastedt that moto has available? I do hope so.
-
I can't wait...this is going to be the "revolution" Mac users have been awaiting.
-
Where exactly did this strain of member called "Spooky" jump from? I haven't seen Spooky anywhere today, in future hardware, OS X, or any other forum. And his/her post cound supercedes mine. Hmmmm...
-
Yes...but wouldn't a single Xeon against a single P4 HT of the same speed, wouldn't the Xeon would be faster, even in HT apps?
-
Usually the beurocratic licensing riffraff doesn't get that technical.
-
Originally posted by Amorph: [quote] (Note that a HT P4 is a bit slower than a non-HT P4 at running single threaded apps.) Wait...if that is true, then why not get "real" multiprocessor Xeon systems, instead of settling for this faux-MP solut…
-
The next switch ad will mos likely feature the Pope...
-
Hyper threading is making the processor think that it is two. This is strange, because aren't dual processors usually slower than their net speed? Like 80% of their net speed or something like that.
-
Yes, but ME want to see truth.
-
In that case, Apple is on a good road. 2.5 ghz? Those suckers aregone. But what I want to see is how the PPC 970 compares against the Xeon. Does anyone know of a 970-Xeon comparison?
-
Hmmm...but which of the 52 Tuesdays will it be?
-
If the 1.8 ghz chip doesn't make it in the first release, I am going to be very pessimistic about future updates. Because if the 1.8 doesn't make it, that is an omen that Apple won't push the potential of the 970 to its limits, but instead live off …
-
Why the hell would Quark faux-artists need a 970 to do their thing when they only need iMacs currently? (Sorry if I offended any Quark afficianados out there) And "G5" would sound stupid, but I am betting that Apple will try to avoid using "Powermac…
-
That is what I am thinking. More and more confirmation of this gives me hope. But what if Apple sees that we are all expecting the 970 in July, and then changes the release date just to play mind games with us hopefuls?
-
Yeah...Iwanted to see the 970 kick a Pentiums little a$$..more than anything, I want to see how the 970 stacks up to the Xeon / Itanium.
-
No...they use processors that are over 2X that speed...