jca666us
About
- Username
- jca666us
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 87
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Ex_Spy_Guy The frash port from the early flash build on android actually runs better on the iPad than the current flash build runs on galaxy tab right now. Hell android runs better on a 3 year old iPhone than it doe…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by nht A dual core 1Ghz cell phone with 512MB+ of RAM and gig of storage? Are you kidding? For an RTOS developer that's not constrained at all. In constrained environments we don't even write C++ but C. No helpful abs…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by samab Users benefit from having a system that has a smaller footprint from the start. That's why the praybook needs a cortex a9 and a gig of ram.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Hattig I actually think that RIM is doing the correct thing with the Playbook and the OS - a proper tablet OS, not tweaking Android, or *shudder* forcing Windows 7 to run on it. However it has got a lesser specifica…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by maccherry RIM can undercut all they want. funny though. How the helll are they supposedly spending millions doing R&D on making this playbook yet they are going to undercut(rumor) the iPad which cost tens of mill…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by solipsism Excellent point. The starting price might be lower, but you don?t exactly get the same product, just the same product category. You make plenty of good points, but I?d also say that having Adobe Air as…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by TNSF iPad was a different situation. It was creating a new market. There was nobody else there yet to gobble up sales. RIM is in different position. They have foregone a huge huge huge opportunity by missing Q4 2…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Ireland Well at $399 it will undercut the iPad. In price. It currently undercuts the iPad in price. However, it only has a 7" screen - most users would see a $499 iPad with twice the memory, a larger screen, and …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DaHarder Which is exactly what my iPad's UI is... except the excessively wide placement of the icons on the iPad makes it look even less space efficient than on the iPhone/iPod Touch. Essentially, iOS works because …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by DaHarder Which is exactly what my iPad's UI is... except the excessively wide placement of the icons on the iPad makes it look even less space efficient than on the iPhone/iPod Touch. Essentially, iOS works because …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by chronster WOW! So 2.2 isn't optimized for tablets, and yet the Galaxy Tab performs THAT WELL? That Galaxy Tab sure is one hell of a device. Can't wait to see 3.0 on it. Thanks for opening my eyes as to how aw…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by extremeskater Doesn't matter. There is no Wifi only version of this Tablet. Even if the retailers bought it that means that expect to sell them. And 600k if the number is ever close is very impressive. You can not …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by chronster Oh cmon I'm KIDDING Good for you. Also, WebOS is stellar. It's failures are the result of poor decisions by palm. I expect HP to do good things with it. Webos had potential - but iOS is realizing…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by chronster How does that disprove anything? It doesn't prove or disprove anything - I was compared the first month of iPad sales - excluding channel partners - 1 million - versus samsungs ambiguous 600k number. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by chronster Again, this isn't what I read, so I can't exactly comment on it. Gizmodo, for instance, said a LOT of good things about it. Hahahahaha - I wouldn't print out anything gizmodo writes unless I was using it …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by chronster Really? My guess is you aren't in a position to comment on Microsoft's methods, especially given the fact that you are blatantly and willfully convincing yourself of a lie about who introduced it first... …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by chronster Which ones? The reviews I read gave the opposite impression; that WP7 was a great start for Microsoft's new platform... I'm sure you can find reviews from people who didn't like it, but in all seriousness…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by chronster Well, one company had their product already available, while the other still had to physically get that product into the hands of people. Which is easier/quicker? A software update, or the release of an en…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by chronster You think WP7 was put together overnight? From the reviews, it certainly sounds like ms slapped it together in record time.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by chronster Really? My guess is you aren't in a position to comment on Microsoft's methods, especially given the fact that you are blatantly and willfully convincing yourself of a lie about who introduced it first... …