jonamac
About
- Username
- jonamac
- Joined
- Visits
- 2
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 12
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 388
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Shaun, UK Apple should have done one of the following IMHO: 1. Keep FCP7 & enhance it then launch FCPX as a seperate "in between product" called iMove Pro. 2. Say we are killing FCP coz we dont want to be in …
-
'Adobe is attempting to drum up support for its competing Premiere Pro. Public relations representatives for the company have called attention to documents assisting users in switching from Final Cut Pro to Premiere Pro, as well as testimonials from…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Apple ][ Sometimes when I search for something in Google, especially foreign words, the retarded Google algorithm will override my request and it will show the results for something else that I didn't ask for. They'r…
-
On Topic: I don't like this idea that if Google develops this Swiffy then everyone can go on using Flash CSx to create dynamic web content and then just port it to HTML5. Whose interests are served by that? The developers' and Adobe's, not the us…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Robin Huber The FCPX petition was #8 on PetitionsOnline.com with over 600 signatures. I am betting there are a lot more iWeb and MobileMe Gallery users out there than there are high end professional video editors. I ho…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Joseph L Actually, I make my coffee in a narrow-neck Silex vacuum pot manufactured in 1938. Every day. And I roast my own beans in a home-made roaster that includes a programmable PID which allows precise temperature…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Joseph L So I did some checking. Here's what it supports: Audio codec Codec\tApple Lossless (ALAC) Sample size\t16 Bit Channels\t2 Sample rate\t44100 2 Channels only? Fail. 16 bit max? Fai…
-
Forgive me the question: If it adds $100 to a system's cost to incorporate AirPlay, how does Apple offer AppleTV for $99?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jlandd Jonamac, but it is your last comment that sums up why the smart money isn't assuming the missing features will show up in a month. Aperture is the program I spend every day in front of professionally, and whil…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by spliff monkey You're whole rant is centered on the idea that FCPX is V1. It's not really. Again if it was they should have called it by another name and in this case it would still not be a rose. I assume since you c…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by quamb Hey, I didn't rate it on the App Store. Not sure why you think that? And I'm not sure why you're going out of your way here to defend Apple, this is a simple, frustrating, criticism. The end. I guess they just…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by quamb Agreed. No doubt this is a knee-jerk response. Sure we can wait to see it evolve, re-add features and what not. Though why is is not okay to complain about what's missing now, on release? Be vocal? Could you …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by quamb Mixed reactions??? It is completely unusable for many "professionals" - I'm dumbfounded why basic functionality such as omf/xml compatibility has been pulled. It's a slap in the face, perhaps a wake up call that …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Joseph L Why would anybody subscribe to a new, unproven service when Apple is offering everything they do with iClod, and more? I mean, everybody knows that Apple never releases anything until it is 100% ready for p…
-
This is just a silly survey. If someone asked me what my preferred place to watch online video would be I wouldn't even think of iTunes, because I think of iTunes as offline video that has been downloaded. YouTube is undoubtedly king of the online v…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Jetz It's a map reader. It's not flight critical. The only reason it came out on the iPad first was because that was the first lightweight tablet to market. I'm pretty sure it'll be out on other operating system's s…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by neiltc13 The real question is, if there truly is demand for flight charts delivered electronically then why is there not a dedicated device for them? It could be built into the cockpit and powered (with battery back…
-
All very nice stuff for the iPad's credibility. These things do matter when aggregated. You can't call something a toy when it's used to navigate passenger airliners. It's lighter than charts and less unwieldy. Makes sense to me.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SHOBIZ IT does not support OS X. IT does not have access to the machines. Did I say IT does not support OS X? A company with over 750,000 employees (of which only about 3,000 use Macs) doesn't have an "IT department" …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by digitalclips Agreed all the way. Love the last part, lol. The multi-touch in Lion is so intuitive going back to Snow Leopard feels like OS 9 in comparison. Is the Lion multi-touch really that different from SL?