cuneglasus
About
- Username
- cuneglasus
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 90
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally posted by Concord Oh, don't act so childish. Thing is, we know Intel is in troubled waters right now and to be fair they did also introduce a new class of processor recently as well (as sucky as it is). What does that say about …
-
Quote: Originally posted by Concord It's been almost 9 months since the G5 was introduced. Even the troubled PC camp has made progress in this time... So true.Intel went from a 3.2 to a 3.4 ghz part.Ibm may as well give up right now.
-
Quote: Originally posted by Jubelum I'd be interested in what other promises he has not delivered on. Not for the purpose of creating an arguement, rather to soften the crushing trauma from it maybe not happening. I tend to take the word "promise…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Messiahtosh Has anyone here even considered the fact that the Mac is inherently more productive, that the lack of raw speed is made up for in ease and productivity? Isnt it pathetic that we have to sit here and mak…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Mac Voyer I think that sometimes Mac users get so caught up in the pricing RDF that they don't really realize just how far out of range Mac prices are. The system Matsu pointed out is not unique. For less than the pr…
-
Quote: Originally posted by JCG While I think that it is important and preferable for Apple to get a G5 into the iMac I think it is more important for them to get it down to the "sweet spot" that they have acknowledged that they are missing. If t…
-
Quote: Originally posted by sls more pics from the SF store opening: http://www.osxfaq.com/apple_store_sf/index2.ws notice the PM G5s and the banner, nothing new... I have no idea whether niloc gets his info from a good source or his arse bu…
-
Quote: Originally posted by nguyenhm16 Dunno, you only need the emulator to be as fast as a 733 MHz PIII (what the XBox I has). The (DirectX?) API calls can probably be mapped to native API pretty easily (like Windows on Windows, which lets you r…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Tomb of the Unknown A foundry is a plant that makes chips for other companies that design chips. The real news here is that the IBM exec said they were about to deliver 90nm versions of a System On a Chip (SOC) desi…
-
Quote: Originally posted by pscates Something like this, Chinney? [edit: hah! I just realized I got your request wrong: I made the front and back flat and the sides rounded Oops! Okay, mentally flip that when viewing mockup...] Just rou…
-
Quote: Originally posted by emig647 Bumping up 200mhz on these g5's would be a waste of time for apple. No one would buy them and just buy the dual 2ghz for way less money. Finally! Someone posts something on one of these boards you can tak…
-
Quote: Originally posted by glumpi There is one BIG notebook manufacturer that has not announced along side with ATI, but will do so and ship in approximately a week. We can't say more than that for the moment, but it is definitely a design win…
-
Quote: For all I know: - there has not been an official announcement from IBM concerning their revised 970 at 90nm. - No piece running with more than 2Ghz has been sighted. - From a IBM paper on the 970fx I have seen it was clear that it would s…
-
Quote: Originally posted by PB Especially for the Power Mac, there is evidence that one has to wait until the end of March: From Xlr8. So exactly where is this program listed.I cant find it on Apple Austrailias website.The only thing I…
-
Quote: Originally posted by snoopy Just hoping I guess. The advantage would be very high production runs and lower cost for the CPU. Regarding Nintendo, I seem to remember they requested some additional functions and/or instructions. My memory…
-
There is no fastest computer.These processors dont have a maximum speed like a car.It entirely depends on the nature of the code,the degree of optimazation for each platform,and obviosly other none processor related issues such as memory.Those who b…
-
Quote: Originally posted by bka77 overkill! sorry kb.I will correct.....
-
Quote: Originally posted by discstickers I think you're getting ahead of yourself here. These 90nm chips are the first rolling off the lines at Fishkill. We just don't know enough about the (semi) new design. Maybe they kept the cache at 512k to …
-
Quote: Originally posted by \\/\\/ickes Umm there is a major difference between the P3 and P4. For one, it is an entirely different core. But most notable is the P4's long pipeline compared to the P3, this long pipeline is why the P4 was able to …
-
Quote: Originally posted by Amorph Actually, the G4 also came from the 603 branch. It borrowed the 604's FPU, but that was about it. I'm not so sure about this.The changes found in the fpu of the 7400 as compaired to the 750 are rather minima…