wakefinance
About
- Username
- wakefinance
- Joined
- Visits
- 2
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 855
Reactions
Comments
-
dasanman69 wrote: » They would also be better off staying with 32GB for the second tier and have a bigger profit margin. On a phone by phone basis, yes, but I imagine that they used sales forecasts to determine that the extra revenue per phone …
-
sog35 wrote: » If thats the case why don't they make the base model 8GB, that way everyone upgrades? See my point? The point is there are still MILLIONS who do fine with 16GB. If Apple's sole reason for the 16GB was to force upgrades they wou…
-
sog35 wrote: » So why not start the base model at 64GB? Bottom line is 16GB fits for TENS of MILLIONS of iPhone users. You must have missed the first sentence of the post you quoted. I'll repeat it here since it answers your question. W…
-
sog35 wrote: » false. The 16GB phones were sold out last week. Hell the $749 6+ 16GB is STILL sold out. You had enough. Cause you think everyone on the planet needs to use a phone exactly like you do. 16GB is enough for many people. Moder…
-
jungmark wrote: » Apparently Apple knows otherwise as it has the data. What Apple knows is that people are more likely to upgrade to the second tier of storage if the first is inadequate. There are a lot more people who are comfortable with 32…
-
sog35 wrote: » but,but,but,but,but,but, no one should make 16GB phones anymore..... keep smoking crack losers. there obviously is still a market for 16GB users. Hell, I have a 64GB 6+ and I'm using less than 8GB of storage. I could easily …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by fallenjt my apology for using improper language. Now back to the point. My argument about starting storage of 16GB is about usability which is not different between cheaper and more expensive phones. People have be…
-
mrmamboatl wrote: » Funny; I told my wife this morning that Siri needed this! I had my iPhone plugged into my TV, streaming the live Apple event on Wednesday. Phil or one of the other presenters demoed Siri by saying "Hey, Siri!" and my phone went…
-
I hope Apple uses surveys like this to decide a round watch is acceptable. Looks like there's not lot of list-reading going on...
-
anantksundaram wrote: » There is no need to explain the obvious. Obvious dodge since neither #5 nor #23 are the least bit defensive. #5 is expressing excitement for Apple's implementation of the feature while #23 is describing the current func…
-
solipsismy wrote: » I can't begin to imagine the world you live in where you see a single test by single person to claim something like "most accurate display ever made." Did he say that? If so, his credintonlas are even more specious. The best yo…
-
thewhitefalcon wrote: » They're hideously inaccurate. You just think they're nice. Its the same way TV's in the store are cranked up to max settings; you think it's nice but its awful. Actually it's the most accurate display ever made. See the…
-
sog35 wrote: » They ignored smaller watch sizes because they dont have the tech to make the internals small enough You're joking, right? Samsung makes all the tiny internal components that other manufacturers use to make small devices.
-
ericthehalfbee wrote: » He's missing one key point. Apple Music isn't designed to get people to leave their current service and change sides. It's to get the huge number of people who aren't using any streaming service to sign up and become a s…
-
rogifan wrote: » Do you really think not releasing Watch sales is the reason Apple was down 7% after hours? All Wall Street cares about right now is iPhone. They pumped up iPhone estimates right before earnings release. Apple didn't beat the "whis…
-
anantksundaram wrote: » You've been here since 2011. If you've got to ask such a silly question about an issue that has been discussed ad nauseam, you haven't been paying attention, and it's really not worthy of an answer. I was really hopin…
-
The article title says shipments, but the body says sales. Which is it?
-
nolamacguy wrote: » because you misconstrued his arguments and got it right for completely the wrong reasons? maybe? I absolutely did not. anantksundaram wrote: » Oh, the 'long-winded' part was for the typical reader of AI, who, in my view, is…
-
anantksundaram wrote: » Wow, I have a fan! (Actually, it's kind of creepy, but what the heck, it's par for the course I suppose...) Clearly, you're unable read or process much, so for the sake of anyone who might be (remotely) interested, let m…
-
anantksundaram wrote: » 'Context?' What context? Some unknown company made up a graph and posted it on the Internet to get their fifteen minutes of fame, that's all. By the moron, for the moron. It's hilarious that you posted several times a…