euphonious
About
- Username
- euphonious
- Joined
- Visits
- 2
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 303
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil So before I report you for being a troll account, could you clarify a few things? First, "crappy iOS product". You're going to have to write a three page essay, single spaced, f…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tune So the iPhone vaguely resembles... shock horror... another touchscreen smartphone?! C'mon. How much differentiation do you expect there to be? It's a device that's 8…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by macarena People do not really understand the implications of using Chrome. I understand. I just don't really care. It doesn't bother me if Google knows every single website I visit. Precisely which…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by mnemonic I actually don't understand why they would say that as the very same ITU have also stated that true 4G must support peak speeds of at least 100 Mbps while on the move and 1 Gbps peak speed while s…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil WHAT was dubious that was done was the question, and I believe we've solved that. Perhaps 'solved' in the sense of 'agreeing to disagree'! I certainly wouldn't go any further th…
-
... so, essentially, you've made a vague statement about it all being 'par for the course', and now you're attempting to close down the argument. Personally I can't see how the fact that the problem has been solved following legal interventi…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil I expect my iPad to work on Wi-Fi since it's advertised in this country as Wi-Fi. Why doesn't it work? I shouldn't have to buy anything else for it to work! It's the exact same argume…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil You might not HAVE wireless Internet near you. You'd have to, let's see, get in a vehicle and go somewhere that has said Internet. And then you might have to pay for it. Better get to…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Exactly, so they need to sue Apple for all of their products, because this happens with all their products. And some of it is for the exact same idea as for which the iPad was sued. Ex…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Then read my analogy for what it is instead. I can't say I follow it either. What do Australian gun laws have to do with the market for 4G service?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Said as an Aussie who doesn't seem to understand the issue here. Huh? Why on earth is it relevant whether he's Australian or not?
-
3.9G isn't very catchy for marketing departments, though :P Technically you may be right, but in common parlance I think we've reached the point where it's quite uncontroversial to say that LTE is 4G.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta Your stupid analogy was to claim that it was equivalent to an airline sending you to an entirely different country. I'm still at a loss as to how you think that's even remotely comparable. Yo…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta Yet another stupid analogy from an Apple hater. Care to explain to me what is 'stupid' about it, other than the fact that it contradicts your point of view? Because in my experience, peopl…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta I'm still waiting for you to explain what Apple did wrong. The iPad connects to 4G networks. If you refuse to accept the point that the advertising was misleading and that misleading adve…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta So why are you picking on Apple when every company in the world uses misleading advertising? Why am I picking on Apple in particular? Well, mainly because this is a thread about an Apple prod…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta OK, so you're incapable of understanding analogies. Take a 200 mph car. Now, try to go 200 mph in Manhattan. It's not possible. Does that mean the car can't go 200 mph? No, that's…
-
Yes, but I was talking about an authoritative legal definition - like the law defines the word 'land', or the word 'theft', or the word 'property'. Those words have a specific legal meaning which emanates from statute. 'Red' doesn't. That's why, i…
-
For goodness sake, that doesn't mean that the law defines the word 'red'! The law may adopt the common meaning of the word 'red' where it is necessary to do so, and it may accept evidence that something was indeed 'red', but that is completely dif…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by NasserAE You are kidding right?! Please tell me you are kidding. Red doesn't have legal definition?! How about scientific definition? Would that work for you? Or you don't believe in science? When…