e_veritas
About
- Username
- e_veritas
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 248
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 Yeah, I guess you are right, Influenza's highest period of "popularity" seemed to die off around 1918-19. I really hope your not an English teacher over there in Australia....
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 If there's a lot of influenza about, does that make it "popular"? Do you consider influenza to be "widely accepted"? I'm hardly the first individual to consider 'most popular' to…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by xRCx If you feel it necessary, but feel free to post all the definations, including the one regarding favor and affection. Oh, I see. So a word is being used wrong if it doesn't match ALL possible defi…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by xRCx the original question was popularity which I do not define as simply the largest quantity. Unfortunately the dictionary does not agree with you. Do I really need to quote a definition again???
-
Quote: Originally Posted by xRCx again you are assuming people are buying android phones because they prefer them over IOS and not because they are cheaper or in many cases free, hmm $400 ipone which would suck my entire months payche…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta That's what happens when you take only a portion of the judge's instructions. She said: "but all of the requirements of the claim must be there, either stated or necessarily implied, so that …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by xRCx popular.... not by a long shot, cheapest and most widely used, sure ill give you that. Considering that 2 out of every 3 people in the world with a smartphone uses Android, how is this not 'po…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 Such as? I honestly can't tell if you're being serious or not. Are you asking what type of recent events are displayed at the top of the screen? Text, emails, etc...
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Quadra 610 Google knows better than to pursue Apple on it. The last thing they want is to be put under a legal microscope. Better to rely on OEMs (while leaving them out to dry) to fight the battles, …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 Except Apple doesn't use this bit "includes displaying, in a status area near a perimeter of a graphical interface, a notification of a recent alert event for a mobile device", NOW we can move …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 Why did they buy Motorola and continue trolling lawsuits then, particularly those involving standards essential patents? Then there were the failed attempts to "loan" patents to HTC s…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Slurpy The growklaw guy is well known to generally be anti-Apple. What an ignorant comment! First, pj (Pamela Jones) from "growklaw [sic]" isn't a 'guy'. Second, pj may be 'anti software pate…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta Words on a piece of paper are usually NOT valid prior art that would allow one to overturn a patent. Ha...you sound just like the jury foreman who self-proclaimed himself the de facto pat…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta That is, of course, nonsense for many reasons: 1. The statement doesn't indicate any bias. 2. The foreman said specifically that they followed the judge's instructions. His direct statemen…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta So does that mean that you're NOT going to tell us which words you're referring to where the foreman allegedly substituted his knowledge for the judge's instructions? Even after I gave you the f…
-
How is it possible that Apple's two top lawyers are not present for the verdict reading??? McElhinny and Lee are both not present....
-
False alarm...Koh may send the jury back
-
Judge Koh just asked the jury "How in the world did you deliberate this case in 2 1/2 days? Are you smoking crack?"
-
On an even bigger different note, the Apple v Samsung jury has allegedly reached a verdict!!!! http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-24/apple-samsung-jury-reaches-verdict-in-patent-trial.html