e_veritas
About
- Username
- e_veritas
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 248
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Quadra 610 There is only ONE THING that matters in any of this. And it's absolutely stunning and glorious in its sheer simplicity: According to Samsung's trial brief, the picture looks …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by mswood Are you sure about Apple needed to cover court cost in the Dutch case. I freely admit I am not up on the various differences in Europe, but I thought if you were the party brought to trial, that you…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by EricTheHalfBee Apple has never, ever said that Samsung's IP is "free for the taking". You are outright lying by making such a statement. What they are saying is a couple of specific patents should not be in…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 So tell us about the agreements Infineon and Intel have with Samsung re UMTS patents? Are they unlicensed chips? According to ComputerWorld... Originally Posted by Compute…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by mswood Yes, on the point that Apple will have to pay some "Cost" for all the earlier devices. There really isn't any disagreement about that., Apple agrees with that. If Apple isn't disagr…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anantksundaram Also, I am not sure if it's the DoJ that would have oversight here, as opposed to the SEC. Considering Samsung Electronics Co exchanges on the Korean Exchange, how would the SE…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Quadra 610 Given that Samsung are *demonstrable* crooks and tech gangsters in the first place (http://forums.appleinsider.com/t/151516/samsungs-evidence-destruction-will-be-factor-in-upcoming-trial#p…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SpamSandwich Because Samsung was not adhering to FRAND terms with Apple. How so? Samsung made an opening offer and Apple refused to negotiate. A Dutch court has already ruled on this issue an…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 Apple was paying the fees for these patents as part of the cost of the chips that used them, just like everyone else does. It was Samsung's decision to terminate agreements and NOT be…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta That's a red herring. What does that have to do with them stealing Apple's work without payment? My comment has nothing to do with Samsung stealing Apple's work without payment. I…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 So why should consumers be charged more for a $600 phone using a 10c chip than a $50 phone using a 10c chip when using a patent to do exactly the same thing? I agree. However, if Apple…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Rogifan Pass the popcorn http://allthingsd.com/20120725/apple-google-warned-samsung-against-copying-us/ Considering that the comments regarding Google's alleged warning were redacted in Apple's tri…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SpamSandwich And even if they had cosmically developed their IP in parallel with Apple's, there would be evidence of this. In fact, in many instances, that is exactly what Samsung is claiming…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by global.philosopher Some of their hard work is based on IP theft from other companies (not just Apple)...go research the various companies that have sued Samsung in the past. No one doubts Samsung spen…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 Google's wholly owned subsidiary Motorola, has changed things a little, although Microsoft can already ban them. All of Motorola's devices have not been banned. It is 18 devices, all of which a…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil Because Apple stole nothing, probably. That'd probably be the reason. Exactly what do you call "using something without paying for it" then? Last time I checked, Apple was the ON…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta That's nice. You apparently haven't learned that patents are one of the reasons we have such cool stuff. Without the ability to protect R&D investments, why should someone invent anything ne…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 Like the injunction banning Google's phones that Microsoft won and Google is now appealing? In case you missed it Motorola Android devices have been banned. Looks like the p…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 So I guess Samsung has shown enough evidence of not being a "slavish copy" to have the original injunction overturned... ...oh, hang on (twice). Ugh...I guess you decided to …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by hill60 Tell it to the US judges who have so far ruled that Samsung "slavishly copied" the iPad, oh yeah and the German ones. If one assumes you are referencing the US preliminary injunction, …