henriok
About
- Username
- henriok
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 537
Reactions
Comments
-
Very unlikely.. How could these chips be dual core, and still be pin compatible if they don't use an on die memory controller? And since 7447 doesn't have one of those I can't belive that this rumor has any merit.
-
Quote: Originally posted by gelosilente well for me, the qud pmac is coming within weeks. the ppc 970mp is ready and why apple has relased the new chud if they aren' t needed? It could be that Apple just have gotten prototype samples of 970M…
-
Quote: Originally posted by onlooker Duh.. My bad. I lost track of what we were talking about. No worries.. Currently in another thread: 970MP confimed by IBM!
-
Quote: Originally posted by hmurchison Nice catch! Indeed!
-
Quote: Originally posted by onlooker According to IBM they had multicore on the Power4, and the Power4+ , but if these were prototypes that never saw the light of day or not, I don't know, who's to say they will not include them again. Anything …
-
Quote: Originally posted by onlooker How do you know? Doesn't the Power4, and 5 have on die memory controllers? I thought the 9xx Dual core PPC's were based on this design. Neither POWER4 nor 970 have an on die memory controller, the POWER…
-
How about Fantastic Four? Opening July 8th.. just happens to be exactly a month after WWDC'05 is taking place.
-
Using benchmarks from a dual core Athlon won't help us much figuring out what we are to gain from a dual core G5. The setup is radically different since the Athlon has an on die memory controller serving both cores thus severely reducing latency bet…
-
Quote: Originally posted by WebFlits Remember the aRTiCa SoC? All too well. Apple would have shut then down in a second if there was any real connection to Apple. Look at CHUD now.. nowhere to be found!
-
Quote: Originally posted by MacRonin And, if I am not mistaken, this is the same badge as used by the Mail app icon (in the Dock) when it tells you how many unread emails are in your InBox... It is not the same badge. Mail uses badges in four…
-
Quote: Originally posted by - J B 7 2 - Couldn't this just be a CHUD update for XBOX2 developers working with three core PowerPCs? I don't think so. The Xbox 2 developer kits isn't running Mac OS X, they are running a PowerPC version of some…
-
Quote: Originally posted by emig647 If you ask me, the 2nd picture looks doctored... I assure you that it's completely authentic. I have this exact setup and are shown the same prefpane. There are three different sizes of badges in the pac…
-
OMG!! No floppy!!!
-
Quote: Originally posted by audiopollution They fit in a laptop. Ah! My mistake.. reading too fast again.
-
What's so special about them? What can these cards do that the Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition can't? And what does these FireGL cards cost?
-
Could? Yes! Will they? Unlikey at this point but quite likey further down the road. I'm actually anticipating that MS will make a computing platform in the same style as Apple have done where they are the sole manufacturer of the hardware as well as…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Tomb of the Unknown Actually, it jsut gives Lenovo rights to the IBM brand for 5 years. Then you obviously haven't read page 8 of The Contract (PDF) where it clearly states that.. IBM agrees and undertakes with t…
-
Quote: Originally posted by RBR I don't know much about this source, but it is more speculation about the prospects of a new (non-X86) IBM PC. http://www.audiogogo.com/content/view/62/80/ It their contract with Lenovo IBM agreed to not buil…
-
Seems like a product that's immensley important to get right the first time. One can't afford having buggy filsesystems. I really don't want a SAN-system that might destroy terabytes of data.
-
Quote: Originally posted by mikenap I'm not surprised to see Apple's name witheld from the Power consortium. It seems to be classic Apple actualy, if they were included on that list, it would partialy disclose some of there future plans and inte…