red oak

About

Username
red oak
Joined
Visits
300
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
3,499
Badges
2
Posts
1,126
  • Jury rules Apple must pay WiLAN $85M for patent infringement

    dant said:
    For once, it would be nice to see Apple try and not be the bully in the school yard and actually act responsibly and ethically for a change. These patents are used by all the phone providers. They are ground breaking patents. They have all signed licenses. The only one fighting was Apple. Now they have lost twice in court, to two jury's, and they still want to appeal? I mean, come on! The technology is not Apples, its been proven. Pay the damages of $85 million for the i phones 6 & 7 and then pony up for what you owe for iphones 8,9,10 and 11 too. (Yup, they now owe for the phones they have created since the case was initially filed, that they admitted ALSO infringed.) Then sign a license to 2023 to when the patents expire. And before anyone tries and spins the patent troll narrative, these patents were invented by the two guys who built the company Wilan, in the first place. They were never acquired from someone else. Just because you can tie things up endlessly in court doesn't mean you should. In fact its shameful and cowardly and arrogant. Apple has hundreds of billions of dollars stored off shore -- avoiding taxes -- and they still won't pony up for the technology they have used to build that mountain of cash. Time to do what is right. Pay for what you are responsible for. For a change.
    You literally just joined AppleInsider yesterday just so you can make all these posts defending WiLAN.   I'm pretty sure you are an employee or have something to financially gain

    Try not to be so obvious at least 
    jdb8167jbdragon
  • Apple's satellite program aims to send data directly to an iPhone

    Boeing can't even successfully launch a supply ship to the International Space Station.   What the hell has happened to that company 
    flyingdpllamawatto_cobracornchip
  • Bearish Apple analyst continues trend of bashing iPhone sales

    The stock is up 25% since he set his $150 price target six months ago   ($175 => $220)

    The stock is up 47% since he set his $120 price target two years ago  ($150 => $220)

    His analysis is full of pure hypothesis story-telling and zero hard facts.  How is it possible he still has his job?   

    razorpitrandominternetpersonwonkothesanenetmageemig647badmonk
  • Apple sells $7B in debt in first bond offer since $285B cash repatriation [u]

    gatorguy said:
    tjwolf said:

    gatorguy said:
    red oak said:
    Debt interest is tax deductible for Apple.  That brings the interest cost down to its dividend yield 

    So,  a nearly cost free way for Apple to buy back its own stock.   Makes a ton of sense, especially if Apple thinks the stock will 2 or 3X in the next 8 years 


    Nothing about the stock repurchase program makes any sense to me. Apple doesn't keep it, they burn it, and if there's some proof that the buybacks have increased the stock price above where it would otherwise be it's being keep secret. 
    This goes both ways: there's no proof that "they burn it" - that share buyback have had no impact on stock prices.  But in general, the laws of supply/demand would suggest that buybacks would positively impact stock price.
    There is proof the stock is "burned", zero residual value. But we do both agree there's no hard evidence (that you or I are privy to) that these Apple repurchases have boosted the stock price. 
    That is a ridiculous take.   When they buy back stock, each remaining shareholder owns a larger piece of the company.  Company valuations are (largely) based on earnings (really cash flow) per share 

    It works great if a company is aggressively funding its business (R&D, cap ex) and is still generating massive excess cash that it can’t effectively use and is defensible.   It is not good if a company is not investing in itself (eg IBM, GE) 

    Apple is in the sweet spot.  Every year it is able to buy back 5-8% of itself.  In five years, it will have bought back over 60% of itself vs 2012 levels.

    As a stockholder (a primary constituent), I think this is awesome. 


    fastasleepapplesnorangesMacPro
  • Editorial: Free advertising for Apple Card isn't coming from unit sales or market share

    The Apple Card rollout has been nothing short of outstanding.   The on-boarding is very well done.  I don’t even feel like I am using a credit card 

    I would not be surprised if this card rivals Amex in 3 years (100 million card holders WW)
    applesnorangesbadmonksootanStrangeDayslkruppP-DogNClostkiwipscooter63watto_cobraManicMoov