longpath
About
- Username
- longpath
- Joined
- Visits
- 140
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 980
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 399
Reactions
-
Apple releases third developer betas for iOS 14, iPadOS 14, watchOS 7 and tvOS 14
-
Facebook SDK bug again causing iOS apps such as Spotify to crash [u]
-
Clipboard snooping still rife across many popular iOS apps
-
Ubisoft sues Apple over Alibaba 'Rainbow Six' game clone in App Store
-
Former Apple lawyer accused of insider trading says charges unconstitutional
The notion that SCOTUS has examined some involving insider trading but not this specific issue shouldn’t surprise anyone familiar with SCOTUS. For a long time, the only SC case on Amemdment 2 was US v Miller, and they never looked at the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act because the plaintiff literally didn’t show up to present the argument. If neither side in cases before SCOTUS raise an issue in their argument, they generally won’t even look at that matter. Even in cases where the court considered a particular argument, in rare instances, they will reverse a previous position, in spite of the legal tradition of Stare Decisus. Dred Scott is an example of a case whose fundamental finding was subsequently reversed by a later court.