jungmark
About
- Username
- jungmark
- Joined
- Visits
- 86
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 4,106
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 6,928
Reactions
-
Telegram founder says iPhone users are digital slaves
-
Epic Games expert says iOS could be like macOS without security drawbacks
hackintoisier said:Xed said:hackintoisier said:When the iPhone ecosystem was small, Apple’s level of control wasn’t really on anyone’s radar, but as the iOS ecosystem has ballooned to billions of users and billions of dollars of trade, I can see why governments and courts around the planet are interested in how the ecosystem operates.But you’re not talking about what the purchaser of the TV does with it AFTER they purchased it. Would you want Best Buy to have the power to tell Samsung or Sony (device manufacturer) that they’re restricted from allowing users to look at Walmart ads after they took the tv home? That would be ludicrous.But yet Apple has the power to tell Netflix (app manufacturer) what users can do with the App AFTER we purchase/download the app? Once the app is on our phones, that’s akin to taking the tv home in my example above. That’s where your analogy breaks down in my view. Netflix should have the right to tell its users about subscription details, etc.App makers can Advertise too. -
Spotify, Tile, Tinder App Store complaints are solely business grievances, Apple says
-
Epic Games witnesses criticize App Store anti-steering provisions
-
UK class action over App Store commission could cost Apple $2B
elijahg said:bloggerblog said:The irony is they want Apple to profit less so that others can profit more
This is where Cook is very two-faced: surely if he truly believes in "equality", he should charge less for the products, such that people who are less privileged should have the same opportunity to own Apple hardware as those more fortunate. But no, it only applies in relation to race and gender, as that can be used as a PR exercise whilst keeping prices high.Also Apple doesnt have a monopoly on the market.