arlor

About

Username
arlor
Joined
Visits
48
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
275
Badges
1
Posts
533
  • Apple's internal 'Overton' AI tool helps with Siri's development

    Anyone who knows a thing or two about ML knows that Ai doesn’t exist. The most optimistic ML engineer will tell you it’s probably 10 to 40 years away.
    And it has been since the 1960s or so. 
    capt. obviousdedgeckoStrangeDays
  • Apple's internal 'Overton' AI tool helps with Siri's development

    Overton, huh? Gee, that’s not at all disturbing.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window
    I had exactly the same thought. 

    Maybe something more innocuous? Like SkyNet, perhaps. 
    JaiOh81razorpit
  • NYC subway commuters get creative rescuing AirPods dropped on tracks

    lkrupp said:
    lkrupp said:
    Another huge failure for Apple. So where are the Samsung ads making fun of AirPod users?
    C'mon man.  Give the persecution complex a rest for at least one thread.   Sweet Jeebus.

    On topic:  If Munster has lost 10 pair and a charging case, the issue is Munster more so than the AirPod.  He needs to invest in those cheap straps.


    Oh, so you’re saying that Apple is not the target of unceasing, malicious persecution from battalions of tech and financial writers who twist, spin, and mold everything Apple into a negative just to get clicks? 
    No, what I'm asking is for you to give it rest... at least for a single thread.  I thought that was pretty clear.  You enter almost every thread with the same woe is me tale of someone attacking the precious.  You never contribute positively to any thread you enter.  No general knowledge, no interesting anecdote, no humorous aside, no perfectly timed "well actually" [pushes up glasses] - who doesn't like to correct their fellow man, no hmmm, I did not know that... nothing except the same tired refrain of OMG somebody somewhere at some point said something about Apple that wasn't 100% flattering.  

    Take this article for instance.  There's nothing in it disparaging Apple or the AirPods.  It's simple a collection of anecdotal tidbits about the tribulations of using AirPods in the crowded NYC subway system with a bonus splash of Gene Munster weirdness.  Nothing connected to this article even suggests a failure by Apple.  Yet you've found a way to make the claim. Why? And yes, I am saying Apple is not the target of unceasing malicious persecution.  That's nothing more that excessive hyperbole.  Are there articles written that are negative about Apple?  Yeah sure there are.  Criticize them until the cows come home. But grinding every thread with the somebody's picking on Apple meme... that's an lkrupp thing, not an Apple thing.  Even in comments where you're trying to compliment Apple you can't seem to stop yourself from taking a dig at some perceived slight from some imaginary foe.  By all means, you do you.  Just sayin', some new material every now and then would be really appreciated.
    I just want to endorse CloudTalkin's note to lkrupp here, too. This used to be a problem with Tallest Skil, who would just never let anything go in the same way. 

    Honestly, most threads here are *NOT* trolled nowadays, or maybe the mods are deleting the troll posts so fast I don't see them. But almost every thread here that discusses even the mildest potential problem with Apple still gets two or three pre-defenses of Apple, before anybody even says anything negative. 

    Think of it like the fast food market. Whether you like McDonald's or not, they're the market leader. They *NEVER* talk about the competition. Burger King, by contrast, constantly talks about how great their products are...compared to McDonald's! It just makes it look like they have some kind of inferiority complex. 

    Apple's leadership is confident that they have the best products, and that they don't need to rise to every insult from fans of other companies' goods. You, lkrupp, and others who rise to the imagined bait on every thread, ought to exhibit the same confidence. It's a better look. 
    CloudTalkinmuthuk_vanalingam
  • iPhone exploits in hacked websites went unnoticed for years

    knowitall said:
    gatorguy said:
    knowitall said:
    Carnage said:
    isidore said:
    Obvious Question: Which websites?
    Various implant commands enable the attackers to steal the container directories of third-party apps. The implant contains a hardcoded list of apps which will always have their container directories uploaded when the implant starts up. Here’s the pre-populated list of bundle identifiers for third-party apps, which will always have their container directories uploaded if the apps are installed:
    com.yahoo.Aerogram
    com.microsoft.Office.Outlook
    com.netease.mailmaster
    com.rebelvox.voxer-lite
    com.viber
    com.google.Gmail
    ph.telegra.Telegraph
    com.tencent.qqmail
    com.atebits.Tweetie2
    net.whatsapp.WhatsApp
    com.skype.skype
    com.facebook.Facebook

    com.tencent.xin

    ….

    Obvious: do not use Facebook, Google and Microsoft, whats new?
    Aren't those spoof sites? Com. or Net. before the website instead of after? 
    As answered below (by Asdasd): domain names read backwards.
    But spoofed or not my remark still stands.
    A) Using Facebook, Google, or Microsoft has absolutely nothing to do with this exploit beyond being additional data targets on the device, or the ability to access those services using that data by the attackers. and B ) They're not domain names read backwards, they're bundle identifiers for apps installed on the device, the list of which can be added to — so you might as well "don't use any apps on your iPhone" which would still not mitigate the threat of every other bit of data on your phone from being uploaded to the attacker.

    You should really change your handle.
    Colloquially, I think "knowitall" usually characterizes somebody who thinks they know it all, but doesn't. So maybe it's appropriate. 

    If the attackers had succeeded in compromising even one of the "sites" on that list, the number of people hit would not be in the "thousands," as the report indicated. So it should've been pretty obvious from the beginning that those were not the affected sites. 
    fastasleep
  • iPhone exploits in hacked websites went unnoticed for years

    All the "tu quoque" attacks on Google on this thread seem beside the point to me.

    iOS was vulnerable to some pretty serious exploits.

    I'm glad they were found. I'm glad they were patched.

    Thanks to Google for finding them and thanks to Apple for patching them. 

    Hopefully the next time this happens it will Apple finding the vulnerabilities instead of a third party. 
    muthuk_vanalingam