trustnoone00

I think that until we as Americans start actually caring about our education system the problem of getting "cheap" labor from other countries will only increase.  In my opinion all we are doing now is giving lip service to the problem and not doing anything to fix the issue.

I don't know it may just be me, but every time I read an article quoting Ming-Chi Kuo I always get the feeling that he is just throwing cow manure at the wall and hoping something will stick.  Also I've been a "casual" reader since before I registered on the forum in 2004.  Like I said that may just be me...

My question throughout this back and forth between technology companies and law enforcement and the government intelligence community has always been if you force back doors to be added to this technology will the government officials who currently utilize their iPhones for "official government business" stop using them?  

Let's enable back doors and see how long it takes to get your government phone hacked and sensitive information stolen.  We all know that they will blame the technology companies for their stollen information. But of course they only have themselves to blame.

Just something I keep thinking about every time I read these articles.

redgeminipa said:

The real lawsuit should be against AT&T, and any other carrier that lets a user's data usage skyrocket past the data cap without any warning to the account holder. Sprint sends out such alerts to users. It wouldn't be hard for AT&T or others to do it. 

Actually, as much as I dislike AT&T and their business practices I recieve automatic text notifications starting when I have hit 75% of my data limit up to 100% and then when they charge me for going over the data cap.

For me I try not to go over my limit so when I'm at home or on a trusted wifi network I disable my LTE, it may not be the best course for many individuals but it works for me.