netrox
About
- Username
- netrox
- Joined
- Visits
- 217
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 4,328
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 1,578
Reactions
-
iPhone Air was almost portless, but concerns about EU regulations prevented it
-
MacBook Air with M4 & Mac Studio with M4 Max, M3 Ultra have arrived
-
First Mac Studio M3 Ultra benchmarks significantly outpace the M2 Ultra
programmer said:john-useless said:
My use case: I do a lot of editing in Final Cut Pro, mostly HD but some 4K, and some of the projects are 30 minutes long. Is it worth it for me to buy a Mac Studio with M3 Ultra? Twice as many horses which aren't that much weakerI'd say that in your case, no if you own a Mac purchased since the M1 or last generation of Intel with discrete cards (AMD).
Video and image editing does not require "deep computation" - M4 Max is blazing fast - it does the job very well. You don't even need 64GB of RAM - it makes no difference at all.
Mac Studio with M3 Ultra seems targeted toward users who use AI LLMs and scientific computing where loading massive amount of datasets into RAM can make a huge difference. LLMs are often around 4GB at a minimum (and produces laughable outputs) to 128GB with better outputs. For AI to work efficiently, they need to be loaded into RAM. It may be cheaper to just use the AI servers than to buy Mac Ultra 3 but if a person truly wants everything "offline" then Ultra 3 is suitable. You can tell that Apple is targeting them by offering massive 256GB or 512GB as an option and advertised about running the LLM in RAM.
-
Apple finally accepts that 64GB is inadequate for iPhones and iPads
-
Mac Studio gets an update to M4 Max or M3 Ultra