jfc1138

weathers said:

I'm not a Trump fan and I am an Apple product user, but I find it ironic that Apple (Tim Cook) doesn't seem to mind selling their products in countries who degrade women and persecute  gays and lesbians. The hypocrisy of either party is getting to ridiculous levels.

There's no mention of Apple not selling stuff to the Party of Trump, just not giving them free stuff. 

9secondkox2 said:

allmypeople said:

Trump has MAJOR issues.

But SO does Clinton... Arguably worse in many areas. I read Clinton Cash (well reviewed in the left & right press) and it is horrifying. There's lots of smart members on this board. Read the book or google some of the articles about it.

Bottom line: I don't think it's a good idea for Apple to take sides.

GREAT post. Where are the Apple boycott on Clinton the lying, murderous war criminal. IT is a choice between the lesser of two evils. And from what I have seen, Trump is a demon, but Clinton is Satan himself. 

Seems Apple is forgetting that America is a place of freedom - speech, religion, choice, etc. 

I like Apple, but censorship is wrong. And that's all this is.

Refusing to give a political party charity isn't remotely "censorship". Please. 

First Amendment baby. Corporations get to decide for themselves what political agendas they support: or oppose. Oh, and the Supreme Court of the United States in Citizens United. 

Now refusing to SELL things to the Republican Party? Isn't that's the Pub argument for wedding cake bakers? If they did (and that's not what the article says, just contributions) it'd be ironic eh?

As someone who upgrades every year AT&T no longer makes any sense. Going straight to Apple for their program this Fall. 

maciekskontakt said:

Yes. And electromagnetic pulse does not travel that distance.

Interesting idea what would occur in a nuclear power plant malfunction. Here's a hint? They. Are. Not. Bombs.