teejay2012
About
- Username
- teejay2012
- Joined
- Visits
- 101
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 2,044
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 434
Reactions
-
Two-year probe of Apple's alleged anti-competitive behavior shut down by Canadian governme...
Janet Hudgins said:What I would like to see from all governments is the courage to call Cook and Apple on farming out production to the East and paying them a subsistence income, if that, in slave labour working conditions. Unless that is changed I can't buy Apple products as I refuse to be complicit. Have a look at this documentary: www.cbc.ca/passionateeye/m/episodes/apples-broken-promises .
-
Lawsuit blames Apple's 'less safe' FaceTime implementation for fatal traffic accident
Rather than blaming Apple for providing a distraction for one particularly careless driver, perhaps they would get more closure by launching a public information campaign about the dangers of using ANY mobile device while driving. To think that most of these tragic cases involving phone use while driving - almost always young drivers - could be prevented by education and perhaps a law is very distressing. That could have been anyone's kid. It is up to 'us', not Apple to keep our kids safe.
-
Apple gives retail employees T-shirt, keepsake credo for holidays
-
First look: Apple's new MacBook Pro with Touch Bar
-
US Supreme Court shows flexibility in first day of Apple v. Samsung case
So if they can't decide on the value of design in driving phone sales, then reduce the amount to 150 million or whatever Samsung is arguing BUT increase the amount for willful infringement to 10X the amount of the award. 1.5 billion sounds more right. Samsung thought they could rip off the design BECAUSE this was a gray area and that there would be a 'fine' that they afford AND still make a lot of money. Total disregard for the intent of patents and US law. Now we see how they regard consumer safety with their phone that catches fire and intentional delays in a recall. They should be taught a lesson. A big lesson.