cashxx
About
- Username
- cashxx
- Joined
- Visits
- 36
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,244
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 114
Reactions
-
VirnetX asks court to ban FaceTime and iMessage, add $190 million to patent payout
gatorguy said:Something that stands out in Apple's response:
"Apple argued that in light of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office decisions rejecting the four patents-in-suit, an injunction would be inappropriate, as would any ongoing royalty based on FaceTime, iMessage and virtual private network on demand features."
That's the same essential argument Samsung made in the Apple/Samsung trial. No injunction or damages because of patent validity questions. Apple of course as we know vehemently argued that an injunction should be appropriate, just as VirnetSX does now, as should damages since the patents were valid at the time of the trial and still have not had a final FINAL ruling of invalidity. -
Los Angeles court orders woman to unlock Touch ID-equipped iPhone for FBI
-
What to expect from Apple's 'let us loop you in' event today
-
Proposed Senate bill penalizing resistance to decryption requests nears completion, could be introd
-
Apple's lease of old Sunnyvale Pepsi bottling plant hints at Project Titan expansion