aussiepaul

About

Username
aussiepaul
Joined
Visits
11
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
76
Badges
0
Posts
144
  • No, Apple did not switch to USB-C on its new MacBook Pros to profit from dongle & adapter sales



    "next they'll remove the keyboard and sell a dongle for that"!  Lol
    elijahgdoggone
  • MacBook Pro fails to earn Consumer Reports recommendation for first time

    Never buy first gen of any product, including Apple.
    pscooter63
  • Mac losing focus of Jony Ive, others in Apple management - report

    Ouch.
    I personally don't understand how Apple as the largest company in the world with no concerns about cash flow can't have multiple successful product teams going.
    How hard is it for them to put out a decent looking updated monitor for example?
    The culture there sounds brutal too...?

    allmypeoplebaconstangai46dysamoriaAI_liasspaceraysjony0tallest skil
  • Apple has 'great desktops' on Mac roadmap, CEO Tim Cook says

    bkkcanuck said:
    welshdog said:
    I know this sort of thing goes against the Apple way, but they really need to go out and talk to people about what they need in a desktop or tower computer.  With the old Mac Pros they had a computer that was dominant in video post proudction (with FCP) and in graphic design.  Then they started ignoring that segment of their business and we went years with no update.  This was under Jobs BTW.  Maybe Steve had decided that workhorse computers didn't fit the Apple future, but Steve is gone and I think this is one example of where he was wrong.  It's not a big market, but it is one that is pretty steady.  It might even be one that could grow if they committed to it with engineering and marketing resources.  In the film and video effects world Apple now has practically zero presence because they don't make machines that kare comparable with the powerful HP and Boxx hardware that is used in this industry.  Boxx has built it's entire business around making super fast tower computers.  I see no reason why Apple couldn't do the same with their superior OS, but again only if they had the willingness to do so.  A lot of people would say "take my money" if Apple released a bleeding edge tower computer.  A lot.
    I have heard a lot about the cheese grater version of the Mac being far superior to the trashcan Mac as far as expandability.  I still have my Mac Pro 2008 (8 core) [with upgraded graphics] and I can tell you that it was less expandable than people seem to pretend.  You had a PCIe bus but no thunderbolt and USB-2.  First thing I did was put in 2x graphics cards.... which left 1 (yes 1 1 only) PCIe slot with lower bandwidth for anything else - in my case I put in a SAS controller (hobbled a bit by the fact that it PCIe bandwidth.... is less than what I could get from Thunderbolt).  Yes - I can put hard drives in it but however many they give you there will never be enough internally... and I know the PC market has been all about putting hard drives in the same case but .... that is not a great design either.  Hard drives are old mechanical beasts that whirl and vibrate and shake and give off lots of heat.... this is best dealt with in a case that is designed for that thing rather than in the same case as your computer.  I have 4 HD slots and 13 HDs.....  I could not give a crap about any new machine having slots for hard drives .... it would be a waste.  Yes, it would be useful to be able to upgrade the graphics.... but then if there are better options in the future and I had a Mac Pro from a few years ago.... guess what... I can just disconnect the hard drive array, mirror the SSD drives .... then sell it and buy a newer model with newer graphics capabilities (assuming an upgraded Mac Pro exists).... not really much of a hinderance give that Apple hardware retains better resell values than other companies... and there seems to always be someone out there willing to buy it.  Really with the way thunderbolt the way it is the only thing that really is useful for upgrading is the memory onboard.....  Trashcan is not that bad of a design....  However I would not be surprised if the new Mac Pro gets a new case again this year (maybe revert to a certain extent).  I get the feeling that the US manufacturing of the current Mac Pro had some issues, and given they have not "nudged" the specs....  I get the feeling they did not nudge them because there may be some issue with the current design and they felt that nudging it was not the best solution.... and there is a new design in the works.   They should have never moved the manufacturing back to the US :open_mouth: 

    The sad thing is the current trash can Mac Pro could have been great but was a flop due to Apple's choice of a custom dual GPU architecture which not surprisingly almost no developers have bothered to optimise for, high pricing, lack of storage and more recently, lack of refreshes, port and ram upgrades etc.
    im not sure Apple can save the Mac Pro now.
    macplusplusRayz2016elijahgai46dysamoria
  • Apple has 'great desktops' on Mac roadmap, CEO Tim Cook says

    eriamjh said:
    No 5K display from Apple tells me that the iMac 5K will NEVER support target display mode because it's just too costly to implement.  

    No Mac Pro updates in 3 years possibly indicates a new form factor with better storage due to the complaints of the small size and its many lightning ports.  

    No new Mac Mini is because Apple just doesn't really care about it much and prefers to sell more expensive machines.


    All of those things aside, at least give us a processor or memory speed update once a year!


    I doubt they'll be introducing a new form factor for the Mac Pro due to the cost to develop the current trash can design.  Also, Apple said something along the lines of this being the future of the Mac Pro for like 10 years during the Keynote.
    Personally I don't mind the form factor, but Apple crippled the machine in many ways.
    If they had chosen to put a couple of NVIDIA cards in there and shipped it with a proper amount of internal storage for example.  Also I think they probably undersized the power supply and thermals by about 100W or so.
    I'm convinced Apple thinks it knows better than its customers and is often seen pushing its own design or API agendas.  The fact is, a lot of scientists rely on CUDA for existing applications and never looked twice at the Mac Pro but would be happy to spend thousands on premium Tesla cards etc.
    The reason these machines are not being updated is because they are not selling.
    I'm quite certain Apple has internal volume targets to hit to recoup costs before embarking on model upgrades.  So we get stuck in a cycle where Apple doesn't give customers what they want/need, then pulls resources away from dying products.
    How many people do you know who own a trash can?  For me, none.  But I know quite a few who have owned previous generation Mac Pro's...
    ai46dysamoria