wonkothesane
About
- Username
- wonkothesane
- Joined
- Visits
- 624
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 3,017
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 1,751
Reactions
-
Brazil will fine Apple again for not including charger with iPhone 13
-
iPhone 13 Pro not a perfect fit with MagSafe Duo, but charging is unaffected
drdavid said:Hate is a strong word. I hate that damn video you insist must intrude on every article. And the persons face that is always there is taking a fair bit of my frustration also. -
Pay up or get out: Apple's options for South Korea's App Store law
crowley said:jbdragon said:tylersdad said:loopless said:Only people who have never developed an app for sale want this to happen. Apple takes care of everything for you, money just appears in your bank account. It's worth every penny.
So how is that working out for you on the X-box??? By the way, even though you don't use Microsoft's app store on Windows, look at all the security issues and viruses on that platform from people just downloading whatever from anywhere. An issue you don't see on the Xbox CLOSED Platform!!! You are trying to compare apples and oranges.
How about we look at the old days. You know the days before the Internet. You know where you had to get your Game or App massed produced onto floppy's or discs. You don't want to have so many made and lose money. Then there was Box Art, and instruction manuals. All put together and sealed. That is all costing YOU money. Then you had the distributors get your software out to all the stores. They took a cut. Then the Stores sold that software and they once again took their own cut.
30% is a massive chunk of a digital good, and Apple's missteps and arbitrary rule applications, on top of a general lack of features and development, undermine it. If Apple are going to charge 30% then they'd better make it worth it, or people will be pissed. And if not, lower the damn charge. "Create a better platform" is not an argument, companies like Microsoft have failed to make a dent in the Apple-Google duopoly, the barriers to entry are too high.You really have it EASY these days. A simple 30% cut and Ap[ple or Google handles everything. All you have to do is upload it into their store.
If people don't like it. They are FREE to create their own OS and Phones and have a completely open platform. There is not a single person stopping anyone from doing that. Create a better platform and people will flee to it.
Apple could have diffused this whole circus if they'd been better custodians of the store and acted like partners to the development community rather than overlords. Monopolies and duopolies aren't innately bad, but monopolistic actions are, and Apple have profiteered and thrown their weight around way too much; it was bound to lead to this.
Also, as long as you cannot side load apps you will have to go through their store which means using their infrastructure for at least showing up in the catalogue with description and images / movies. That’s what you may be charged for, then. -
Apple attorneys threaten UK market exit if court orders 'unacceptable' patent fees
-
Philips Hue to introduce new bulbs in September
OutdoorAppDeveloper said:All my Hue bulbs failed after a few years of daily operation. They start to make loud "crack" noises and then start strobing on and off for several seconds. They failed one after another with the same problem. Bottom line: They were not properly designed and don't have anything close to the promised lifespan. I won't buy expensive bulbs from Philips again. The ones with built in Bluetooth that don't need a hub are a lot more interesting.