wonkothesane

About

Username
wonkothesane
Joined
Visits
624
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
3,017
Badges
2
Posts
1,751

Reactions

1.5KLike2Dislike94Informative

  • How Apple learned automation can't match human skill

    wonkothesanewonkothesane
    I am not sure how many here have some background in industrial engineering. So I will try to explain in simple words. 

    It is not about: can it be done. Rather, it is about: can it be done such that it is sufficiently reliable and at the same time cost effective. 

    It’s simply a difference between tightening 10 screws or ten million ones. 

    We don’t talk about pick and place machines, or dispensing flux:solder paste. 

    We talk very specific processes that imply specific challenges. 

    Now, specifically tightening  on that scale and in this dimensions is this a challenge. Drilling “not so tiny screws” is a very standard process in Industry. And usually the correct amount of tightening is measured through monitoring of torque and/or angle. This works well when the inner resistance of the screwing part in that robot is significantly smaller than what you want to measure -and- the inevitable variation in geometry of the threads as well do not matter compared to what you need to observe in order to monitor your process. With tiny screws as used in the assembly of iPhones etc. this is not state of the art, meaning you can’t buy it off the shelf. 

    There are similar challenges when dispensing glue in that tiny amount as required here. Stuff you do easily when doing this - some skill provided - by hand (such as compensating for change of viscosity based on small variations in ambient temperature, or material age, are sometimes surprisingly hard to implement automatically. 

    It is also no big deal to drill a hole. Drilling 10 thousands in an airplane section, however, is. 

    An experienced machine operator will easily tell you whether the cutting process is running well by simply listening to it. Decades of research have gone into automating this. So far, with very limited success. 

    I am even not surprised about the issues with the ja fling of parts. While it sounds ridiculously easy to move a part from one station to another , the devil is again in the details. Takt time variations can be one, for example, reliably scanning parts, controlled acceleration and deceleration. All depending on the masses you want to move, and of course the required speed. If you go to major companies in automotive or aerospace you will find that handling is very often reduced to the max, or completely eliminated - due to cost and reliability. 

    In all this one has also to consider that one big difference in the consumer electronic industry is that products are in do parison manufactured for a quite short time before a new model comes. This means, that there is simply also much less time for straitening out and issues before the new model arrives. 

    All in all, I am sure that the major subassembly steps, such as making a PCB, are fully automated. It is the more “manual” processes that mount the sub assemblies together (such as screwing or glueing, welding...) are a challenge on that dimensional and production volume scale. 
    dedgeckowatto_cobrafastasleep

  • Apple's Emergency SOS feature foils attempted sexual assault

    wonkothesanewonkothesane
     said:
    The emergency trigger (5x button push) actually lets out a loud alarm letting you know it's about to call 911. How did the rapist not hear that and turn it off? How can any perp not hear that and just turn it off?
    You can turn the countdown off in the settings. Maybe she had it switched off?


    watto_cobrarazorpit

  • Tim Cook says Japan's Seiko Advance is why there's a Midnight Green iPhone

    wonkothesanewonkothesane
    Apple: cash + x. Where x stands for what’s increasingly rare to find: tangible values beyond economic success and a mission. 

    According to an interview with Ahrendts during her interview with Cook she asked what exactly she was being hired for. To which he supposedly answered something along „leave the world a better place“ (can’t find the source right now). This article makes sich statements more credible. 
    minicoffeewatto_cobrajdb8167

  • Apple issues iOS 13.2.1 update for HomePod following bricking problems

    wonkothesanewonkothesane
    onlyhope said:
    13.2.1 fixed my HomePod issues but I have not tried the multi-voice feature.  I do like the 'ambient sounds' feature but would really like it if Siri would lower the volume - rather than me having to do it physically via HomeKit audio control.
    Why don’t you create a Siri Shortcut that plays an ambient sound at a specified volume?
    Alex1N

  • Apple's iOS 13.2 release bricks HomePod for some users [u]

    wonkothesanewonkothesane
    flydog said:
    jungmark said:
    I always wait at least a week before updating. 
    Given that there are over 1.5 billion iOS devices, the odds of a device being bricked are lower than being struck by lightning. 

    But wait away if it makes you feel better. 
    Actually, it would appear you’re correct according to National Geographic:

    The odds of becoming a lightningvictim in the U.S. in any one year is 1 in 700,000. The odds of being struck in your lifetime is 1 in 3,000
    philboogieStrangeDayswatto_cobra