danox

miiwtwo said:

danox said:

miiwtwo said:

Xed said:

miiwtwo said:

do you really think that vision pro is different comparing its competitors and will go to re invent the computer, i think this kind of article only try to convince to buy it and justify the price 'cause isnt novelty, is good but too expensive, in few months google and friends gonna sell the same concept for "less",

Same concept doesn’t equal the same quality or experience. Meta Quest is also the same concept. Do you think that Meta Quest is just as good?

Of course, people like you made the same comments about the iPhone, iPad, AirPods, Mac, and iPod. Pretty much every big product by Apple already existed in concept in the market but Apple didn’t better with many not understanding how synergy between OS, HW, and UX make an iota of difference to the customer.

never said anything about meta and $500 for an iPhone isnt 3500 for the mass public, sorry if i hurt your feelings, your comment is the perfect example, you think 'cause is apple means success, no sir, you wrong, in this case, the price is the biggest problem, people like me, you are so sad,

The price will not matter, the only thing that matters is does it work and how much software will be available at launch, since the AVP has a M2/M3 in it  almost all of the software will work on day one. To the consternation of the competition.

the price will no matter, hahaha, dream on

The price will only matter to the usual Apple complainers who will say Apple needs to sell it at a loss for 500 dollars. They have been crying for 25 years....

Once again the Apple Vision Pro is a M2/M3 MacBook Pro computer with a R1 co-processor SOC with 12 camera's and will never be under 2,000 dollars anytime soon.

Russell359 said:

I'm biased as a former Amiga owner, but I'm going to say that the failure of the Amiga was not because it was a poor copy of the Mac, but because of poor business skills by Jack Tramiel and the leadership of Commodore. The Amiga was in fact far more capable than either the IBM PC (which was the industry standard at the time) or the Apple Macintosh. At a time when the IBM PC was pretty much limited to 16 colors and the Mac was black and white, the Commodore Amiga was capable of 4096 colors, had four voice stereo sound AND had a TRUE preemptive multi-tasking operating system which neither the PC or the Mac would have for another FIVE YEARS.

Former Amiga owner, the Amiga was ahead hardware wise from 1985 to 1994 at the collapse, Commodore had a great OS and even better hardware and that is a big reason Apple Silicon is so good it's designed in house with the OS, most who have never experienced that type of vertical computer system just don't appreciate the significance, (makes Apple a screaming buy/hold) I switched over to Mac's from the Amiga when I heard about 0SX, used Microsoft computers (Autodesk) for work but never personally owned one. The Amiga also had some great game software at the time and was much bigger in the UK, Germany, and Australia.

Note: many Amiga game titles are better game play-wise to many of the titles on both platforms which makes Apple game performance even more anemic, in the end I'm afraid Apple is going to need to roll up it's sleeves (as usual) and create at least two optimize titles for their hardware to show what the hardware is really capable of.

miiwtwo said:

Xed said:

miiwtwo said:

do you really think that vision pro is different comparing its competitors and will go to re invent the computer, i think this kind of article only try to convince to buy it and justify the price 'cause isnt novelty, is good but too expensive, in few months google and friends gonna sell the same concept for "less",

Same concept doesn’t equal the same quality or experience. Meta Quest is also the same concept. Do you think that Meta Quest is just as good?

Of course, people like you made the same comments about the iPhone, iPad, AirPods, Mac, and iPod. Pretty much every big product by Apple already existed in concept in the market but Apple didn’t better with many not understanding how synergy between OS, HW, and UX make an iota of difference to the customer.

never said anything about meta and $500 for an iPhone isnt 3500 for the mass public, sorry if i hurt your feelings, your comment is the perfect example, you think 'cause is apple means success, no sir, you wrong, in this case, the price is the biggest problem, people like me, you are so sad,

The price will not matter, the only thing that matters is does it work and how much software will be available at launch, since the AVP has a M2/M3 in it  almost all of the software will work on day one. To the consternation of the competition.

Never trust cloud services for storage for longer than a day and that is only in a temporary emergency. And Google never.

barta said:

Glad that you are in a better spot. I too would be curious to hear more about the question regarding the must have app for vision.

The ecosystem, and initially spacial video capability, watch out for the crying by other video outfits Google and governmental agencies the (EU) crying about access to the new Apple gate and the unfairness of it all particularly if Apple takes advantage and starts up a spacial video site (ala YouTube) for those iPhone 15 Pro and 16 Pro iPhones users to upload to. Talk about disruptive innovation.

Speaking of which isn't the Quest 3 on the market now how's that fiasco going?