harry wild

35 + 19 is 54% profit from the median size physical size 5.5" models.  Not screen size but height of X and 8.

There is no X product RED cycle!

No X in Red?  That is quite strange decision to not include the flagship especially in the Far East markets where the wealthy would buy on impulse and prestige!  Many stainless coloration techniques been developed back in the 1930s.  Surely, Apple has the resource to have a couple of engineers to dig up the solution!  LOL!

Cesar Battistini Maziero said:

harry wild said:

All Apple has to do for modularity is look at the gamer's built PC industry!  They been doing this for at least 7 years and counting!  If Apple want to be cheap and be standardized.  But know Apple, everything will be proprietary and can only be purchased through Apple for the most profit.

For the most efficiency, not most profit.  Apple doesn't care to be cheap! They care to make the best products on their class.

If you want cheap go with windows and get what you paid for.

I think you are completely ignorant on the gaming PC and cutting edge machines and components.  It make s a Mac Pro look like a beginner's gaming PC in comparison.  Apple always uses the upper tier GPU engine that already a year old in their new top line machines!  Apple never use the most high end graphics card because to expensive and they cannot get a good price on them because of the demand. LOL!

Not helping themselves in not updating the iPad Mini each year!  It would not cost them very much to just add memory and new SoC to the same design.  They seem to not real care that their are buyers who what to update their Minis.