techprod1gy

About

Username
techprod1gy
Joined
Visits
52
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
752
Badges
1
Posts
838
  • Apple cuts prices on USB-C & Thunderbolt 3 gear in response to MacBook Pro backlash

    zoetmb said:
    slurpy said:
    Awesome move by Apple. This SHOULD shut up most of the complaints, but of course it won't. 
    It's not like Apple is selling $500 laptops.   There's two ways to look at this:  

    The first is that if someone is buying a laptop that starts at $2400, they should't be complaining about having to buy some adapters, even if they're overpriced and that if you're a pro, technology advances and the investment is the price of doing business.  

    The other way to look at it is that if someone is spending between $2400 and $4300 (for the MBP with all options except for application software and AppleCare), Apple shouldn't have cheaped out and they should have provided 2 to 4 adapters in the box of the customer's choosing.   The price of four adapters/cables is as much as a cheap PC.   

    And then my cost of ownership goes up because I can't replace the battery, expand memory or replace the SSD myself.   Or, if I Iive with a 256GB SSD, I've got to get a ton of external storage for pro-level photos and video and live with the hassle of not having every file with me when I'm out of the home/office.  

    This is another example of Apple labeling something "pro" and then not understanding the workflow of their pro customers.   They did that with FinalCutPro and they did it when they moved away from the tower configuration of the MacPro.  

    Every time Apple switches ports, they tell the market how their new choices are the greatest and how they want both manufacturers and consumers to commit to that port.  Then after a few years, they change their minds and they move on to something else.   Did they really need to drop Mag-safe?  What about all the people who bought extra power supplies to keep at home/office, etc.?   HDMI is ubiquitous on TVs and receivers and the cables have become inexpensive, but now I've got to buy an adapter that costs ten times what the cable cost?

    What was Apple's rationale for going solely to USB-C?   Was it because they truly think this port is the future and that the accessory market will fully move to that port and that it provides technological advantages?   Or was it really because of Ive's anal-obsessiveness over thinness and not wanting to look at different sized/shaped ports on the side of the machine?   What drives me crazy is that Apple wants the machine to have this superior industrial design so that it looks great in photos and in ads, but they have no problem with users having to stick a bunch of dongles and adapters on the thing.   It's the same with the iPhone and the obsession with thinness, but then we have to put it in a case because it can't survive a fall.   So few are really seeing and feeling the thinness anyway.  Sometimes I think people at Apple don't actually use the products they produce in the real world. 

    So, IMO, criticism is warranted.   If Apple wants my money, they're going to have to do a bit better.   I hate using PCs at work, but I'm not spending $4K to $5K on my next computer and I don't want to feel like I have less than what I have today.  So as much as I hate Windows, my next laptop might actually be a Windows machine.  And I've been an Apple customer for 35 years. 
    I think many of your comments are warranted.  The only observation I have is when calculating value...most Apple products I purchase last years beyond the Windows counterpart.  In business this makes up for a lot.  Also my Apple users require significantly less support.  Currently we have 1 Apple support ticket for every 20 Windows.  That is huge.
    baconstang
  • Kuo: Demand for new MacBook Pro models tepid due to high prices, disappointing specs

    I just laugh at people who bitch about not being more than 16Gig RAM.  There are less than 2% of us that will actually use more than that regularly.  I would also like to point out or maybe ask when the last time the CPU was the bottle neck?  Like never.   So why?  As for the price...The only ones that bitch are the ones that cannot afford it.  Those that can afford it know the value regardless of spec.  The last thing regarding spec and performance.  The true value is what can all of the components do for me?  When you add up everything what do I get?  With Apple you get AMAZING performance and value.
    williamlondonkudu
  • Intel's chip design, not Apple's choices, reason behind Thunderbolt 3 & RAM issues in new MacBook P

    For my use the CPU choices and RAM at 16G is just fine. I assume more hard core applications require more such as video editing and music production?
    williamlondonrandominternetpersondoozydozenpulseimagesdysamoriaiqatedo
  • Apple suggests that it has permanently exited the stand-alone monitor business

    I think this makes a lot of sense. I did like the build quality of the Apple monitors. Are the LG versions made out of plastic or Aluminum? I would prefer having nice looking monitors on my desk. Any suggestions on this?
    coolfactor
  • Ecobee3 Lite cuts smart thermostat's price while keeping Apple HomeKit support

    I have used most of the smart thermostats. They all have paid for themselves through energy savings and probably on convenience alone from my perspective. I often thought if one of these companies can hit the $99 mark with a smart thermostat they would really knock it out of the park. I do not like the fact that this runs on batteries. That is a deal breaker from me. I do like the direction overall that they are going with trying to get the price point low enough.
    longpath