bigtds

About

Banned
Username
bigtds
Joined
Visits
41
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
435
Badges
1
Posts
167
  • Apple's App Store generated 80% more revenue than Google Play with a third as many install...

    bigtds said:
    Sad how Google can just steal Apples hard work and rake in $14B a year. Wow.


    Man you really need to get a life.
    Says the one who rants about the prices of things they will never buy.
    How do you know what I would or wouldn't buy? I will purchase whatever provides value to me regardless of price or brand. Complaining about the price of a particular item doesn't mean I won't buy it. It just means it's pricey. Plenty of users on this site do the same. Making idiotic assumptions about other people's purchases of certain brands based on falsely percieved economic status seems to be a hobby for some on this site.
    avon b7AppleExposedFileMakerFeller
  • Samsung expected to unveil Galaxy Note 10 at Unpacked event on Aug. 7

    majorsl said:
    As an owner of a new OnePlus 7 Pro, I'll be the fish, thanks.  Come on in, the water is fine!  Seriously, tho... the OnePlus tweaks to Android (OxygenOS) got rid of a lot of the bloat. It also didn't come with vendor (AT&T) loaded bloatware that my old galaxy did.  It's a pretty good experience.
    I don't support plagiarism. I'll stick to privacy and security.
    Doesn't sound like you support anything that isn't Apple. Your house must be pretty empty.
    avon b7Carnage
  • Apartment & insurance firm sue Apple over lethal iPad fire

    This is SB. The insurance company is happy to take your money on a regular basis but when it comes time to pay out in a few instances, they look for someone to recoup their losses. I hope Apple fights this. At some point you have to stop this nonsense.
    AppleExposedlongpathmac_dogradarthekatnetmage
  • iPad wins again, Google cancels upcoming tablet products

    bigtds said:
    bigtds said:

    "A tablet from Google would be released why? Leave those to OEM's"

    YOUR words. You didn't mention the hardware being crap just that Google should not be in the market.

    Again, forget the quality, had it been financially successful and sold well you would have pretended it was better than iPad and passively suggested we all go buy one.

    You even mention Fire tablets and how you know so many people that have them. Those are crap too. Even worse than the Slate but I won't see you mention Amazon leaving tablets to other OEMs.
    The hardware wasn't crap. In fact, most reviewers agree it was pretty good. The software on the other hand is pretty bad. Couple that with an unworthy high price and it was a non starter for many including me. I had high hopes for it but, in the end, the iPad pro was a better choice.

    Based on my observations it was laggy as heck and offered nothing new. Of course I'm comparing it to a real iPad. Standards may vary. Maybe the software caused it to lag?
    I think at the bottom end, it was both the Intel m3 and crappy software. There should have been no issues with an intel i5. Either way, it was an embarrassing disaster.  Worse, at $999 for the i5, my iPad pro was cheaper and better in every way.
    I have a video on this which I posted on page 1 that shows proof of the lag. Also Marques Brownlee (I think that's his name) also shows the Pixel lagging.
    All I was saying is that the i5 should not have had a problem with lag. The fact that it did is proof the the software was crap. Oh, and I watched your video. Really embarrassing. You might want to stick to your knockoff diatribes on AppleInsider.
    AppleExposedwatto_cobra
  • iPad wins again, Google cancels upcoming tablet products

    bigtds said:

    "A tablet from Google would be released why? Leave those to OEM's"

    YOUR words. You didn't mention the hardware being crap just that Google should not be in the market.

    Again, forget the quality, had it been financially successful and sold well you would have pretended it was better than iPad and passively suggested we all go buy one.

    You even mention Fire tablets and how you know so many people that have them. Those are crap too. Even worse than the Slate but I won't see you mention Amazon leaving tablets to other OEMs.
    The hardware wasn't crap. In fact, most reviewers agree it was pretty good. The software on the other hand is pretty bad. Couple that with an unworthy high price and it was a non starter for many including me. I had high hopes for it but, in the end, the iPad pro was a better choice.

    Based on my observations it was laggy as heck and offered nothing new. Of course I'm comparing it to a real iPad. Standards may vary. Maybe the software caused it to lag?
    I think at the bottom end, it was both the Intel m3 and crappy software. There should have been no issues with an intel i5. Either way, it was an embarrassing disaster.  Worse, at $999 for the i5, my iPad pro was cheaper and better in every way.
    watto_cobra