manfred zorn
About
- Username
- manfred zorn
- Joined
- Visits
- 74
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 134
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 28
Reactions
-
Senate draft bill requires companies extract, decrypt data for law enforcement
-
Justice Department asserts it could demand source code, signing key from Apple
The assumption that you could just hand over the entire source code to an iPhone and makes sense of it in a reasonable time is ludicrous. This is the same government that cannot roll out a health care website, but would be trying to understand and repurpose an entire operating system. And I'm sure there will be plenty of Apple engineers to jump ship to a government salary to help explain it to them. -
Take a stand against the Obama/FBI anti-encryption charm offensive
The government has not used the All Writs Act to force manufacturers of paper shredders to develop an un-shredder. Maybe because it's not such a widespread problem. Or manufacturers of matches to recreate burnt documents from the ashes. Or gun manufacturers to develop tools to undo the damage to the other iPhone and computer hard drive destroyed by the San Bernadino attackers by putting a bullet in them.
There are limits, even if we can put a man on the moon.
-
Apple counsel Bruce Sewell calls DOJ filing 'cheap shot' that seeks to 'vilify'
Emericus said:... the FBI wants to avoid supporting the idea that it's okay and legal for any tech company to design devices that thwart all attempts at entry by law enforcement or anyone else. While such devices and the networks they operate on will naturally keep my own legal emails and bank account numbers secure, they will certainly also become the haven for all manner of illegal behavior. And if allowed to be used freely in private and public, as iPhones are now, such devices over time could render many forms of law enforcement perpetually ineffective (perhaps they already are).....The same would apply to manufacturers of paper shredders. They could make many forms of law enforcement access ineffective. So is fire or the manufacturers of matches, gas lighters, etc. It is not illegal to own and use a paper shredder or matches. Encryption on a phone is like a paper shredder where with the right key you can "unshred" the paper.
Given that export of encryption software is no longer export-controlled, companies outside the US can and have developed their own versions. The current top algorithms AES and RSA have originally been developed outside the US. What that means is that crippling encryption on iPhones in the US would just cripple Americans. Foreign terrorists could easily load their own encryption software on the phone and thus "shred" communication from prying eyes or LEO.
This really amounts to a tradeoff between privacy for all or privacy only for those you are cunning and able to use other means of hiding their intentions.
-
Government says Apple arguments in encryption case a 'diversion,' presents point-by-point rebuttal
Dave S said:After all, if this was a locked diary and the gov't asked the locksmith to pick the lock, does anyone really think the locksmith could defend by stating that the lock is proprietary and he does not want to pick it for fear that the info could be used to pick locks on other diaries he sold. Sounds ridiculous eh? Well, that is how ridiculous Apple's argument seems to this lawyer! If it can be done, it should be.