volcan
About
- Username
- volcan
- Joined
- Visits
- 99
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,747
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 1,799
Reactions
-
U.K. regulatory board backs Apple iPhone X claim of 'studio quality' portraits
I felt like the ads were dissing true pro photographers. I have an awesome studio and create lighting effects impossible with a software only solution. I use real mirrors, multiple white boards on c-stands, coves, strobes, an actual light meter and the camera is mounted on a expensive stand not hand held or using some consumer tripod.
I've never used Apple's lighting effects but I can't imagine it has the flexibility of having unlimited light sources like I have. I can't even achieve the same results in Photoshop that I can create in the studio and I am an expert Photoshop power user with many years of experience, but I'm sure for the novice, the iPhone lighting effects are fun to use.
iPhone cameras are actually useful in a professional environment though - for example, in movie making where you wouldn't want to use a $100K camera that might get damaged in an explosion scene or crash while mounted on a drone. iPhone's camera is truly amazing but does not replace a studio. -
Here are all the big changes to Apple Maps from 2017 through 2019
-
Apple's work towards waterproof iPhones continues with new sealing technology
-
Apple staring down possibility of new per-employee tax in Cupertino
-
AOC debuts MacBook-compatible 15.6-inch USB-C monitor
tallest skil said:volcan said:What would people use this for? Just more space for palettes when using Logic or FCPX?