rundhvid

About

Username
rundhvid
Joined
Visits
139
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
262
Badges
0
Posts
127
  • Apple Watch Series 7 uses same processor as predecessor

    As I more or less expected, there is nothing to the new Apple Watch that compels me to upgrade from my 6, nor wife wife either.

    That is not to say that other's might find it a compelling upgrade.  Just not for us.
    How magnanimous of you 😜
    But next year, she goes for sure 😵🥴
    beowulfschmidt
  • Apple not a monopoly but must allow alternate payment methods for apps, judge rules

    davidw said:
    jcs2305 said:
    georgie01 said:

    So you think you're smarter than the judge? Go apply for her job.  Apple's a company, not your friend.  Sooner you realize that the better your life will be.  Apple got exactly what it deserved.
    So you believe that Apple should be required to allow developers to put their apps on Apple’s App Store for free and users download them for free and the developer can charge for the app outside of Apple’s App Store. So then Apple makes no money for providing a really easy place for the developers to distribute apps while spending money for the resources and infrastructure to maintain a secure App Store?

    Talk about a spoiled and entitled attitude…
    I have paid for Netflix and Youtube Premium outside of the app store for years now. Netflix premium is what actually made me aware of the 30% charge that Apple adds if you do the recurring payment through the app store. I was paying $12.99 a month , but I kept seeing the price advertised as $9.99? Eventually it dawned on the extra $3.00 was being put back on me because of Apple charging them 30% to handle the payment? I cancelled my subscription on my iPhone and set up my monthly billing through youtube's website. I have been paying $9.99 ever since.

    You can also sign up for Disney+ or their bundle with ESPN+ and Hulu on Disneyplus.com and pay them directly instead of through the app store.


    These services didn't steer me like Epic did by offering alternative payment options within the app, but the end result is still the same.



    That is wrong. One do not get a discount from Netflix (or YouTube Premium) for paying outside the platform. Whether paying on Android, iOS or a computer, Netflix charges the same.

    For one

    There is no $9.99 Netflix subscription plan. The lowest cost plan now is Basic and cost $8.99. Basic plan can only stream on 1 screen at a time and no HD. The Standard plan cost $13.99, stream on 2 screen at a time and has HD. The Premium plan cost $17.99  has 4K and can stream on 4 screen at a time. 

    For two

    $9.99 is not a 30% discount from $12.99. A 30% discount on $12.99 would be $3.90. So if you got a 30% discount, it should cost you $9.10.

    For three

    I don't think you can pay for your Netflix subscription on YouTube. And even if you could, you would not get a discount.

    For four

    About the only way to get a discount on your Netflix subscription is to buy discounted iTunes gift cards and use your iTunes account to pay for your subscription. But this has ended for new subscribers.

    https://runningwithmiles.boardingarea.com/a-trick-for-cheaper-netflix-has-ended-with-one-big-exception/

    I been paying for my Standard Netflix subscription for over 15 years now. I started when Netflix was only a mail order DVD rental business. And i've been paying using auto CC deduction since the second or third month. No discount given and no discount ever offered when they became a streaming service on mobile devices using their free app.  



     

    Back to school, Buddy: the mathematics of discount vs surcharge is a little more complicated than that 👀😳🥸


                  9,99

    +                30%

                  2,997

    --------------------

    =         12,987

    --------------------

    fastasleepsconosciuto
  • iPhone 13 will get satellite communications in just a few markets

    Amazing how people just pontificate about topics on which they have literally zero industry knowledge.
    Buddy—you’ve got it backwards: the less knowledge I have on a given subject, the easier it is for me to provide clear-cut, unambiguous truths 👀😜

    Absence of knowledge also protects all my prejudices from fatal confrontations with reality 🙈
    sconosciutogatorguylkrupprcomeauGG1fastasleep
  • Sweden owes $1.5M to convicted drug dealers in bitcoin blunder

    DangDave said:
    Ridiculous! 

    What if the price of Bitcoin had gone down, would the criminals have had to pay them the difference? Not likely. There is no mention of any court having ruled one way or the other? Stupid story. 
    Yeah!

    Totally unprofessional to publish stories written objectively and riddled with open ended questions!
    —who needs questions? Not me—I want stories with answers to all questions—preferably condensed to a single, simple truth!

    Bollocks—all this thinking have made me disorientated 👀🤭😵
    beowulfschmidtwatto_cobra
  • Bill Gates said Steve Jobs caught Microsoft 'flat-footed' with launch of iTunes Store

    mpantone said:
    It wasn't predictable. That's why Microsoft was caught flat footed. Remember that Apple's market valuation was decidedly small compared to Microsoft, really a David vs. Goliath situation at the time.

    Time and time again Jobs surprised. The iPod itself was widely doubted when it debuted (2002 I think); just do an Internet search for "cmdrtaco ipod" to see what a popular technologist thought.

    Apple stunned again with the iPhone in 2007 and many predicted failure due to the lack of a physical keyboard. Remember that the RIM BlackBerry was the smartphone gold standard at the time and Windows mobile phones were still a significant player.

    Apple again caught the industry off guard when it released its own silicon in the form of the A-series SoCs and a few years later left the entire semiconductor industry speechless when the A-series jumped to 64-bit architecture, years before it was expected to show up in a mainstream product.

    Apple crushed it again with the iPad and then killed it with Apple Watch, the latter despite long-standing rumors that Apple had been testing "wearables" on its corporate campus for years. Remember that each time, Apple was not first to market MP3 players, online media stores, smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, custom ARM silicon.

    About the only thing predictable from Apple in the past five years was the Apple Silicon Mac. Savvy industry watchers presumed that Apple had been running macOS on prototype ARM-powered Macs in their labs for years, maybe as early as that first 64-bit A7 SoC. There were hints all along: the deprecation of OpenGL, the end of support for 32-bit apps. The inclusion of specialized chips like the T2 Security Chip which was clearly an interim solution to be paired with Intel CPUs until Apple could ship their own SoC with that functionality built in.

    One can see where this is headed for the Macs. macOS Monterey is leveraging the Neural Engine in the M1 SoC, the machine learning silicon. My guess is that the M2 and future designs will vastly improve on the Neural Engine's capabilities which will take on tasks that it is better suited for than the CPU cores: image recognition, text recognition, voice recognition, signal processing (both audio and video). As mentioned in the WWDC keynote, more machine learning tasks will be handled on device rather than being sent to Apple's servers.

    Nvidia's GeForce RTX GPUs do audio and video processing with their Tensor cores (machine learning); if you have an GeForce 20 or 30 series graphics card, you can use the Nvidia Broadcast software to clean up audiocasting and videocasting.
    Excellent written recap of the highlights in ’s history—on which I agree, except for what aspect is (most) predictable about :



    —how about that for predictability! 😎
    watto_cobra