robertwalter

About

Username
robertwalter
Joined
Visits
55
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
420
Badges
1
Posts
276
  • Apple responds to latest WikiLeaks CIA document dump, says iPhone and Mac exploits fixed

    Apple also seemed to indicate that it wasn't pursuing getting the WikiLks doc dump because it was stolen. 

    IIRC the dumps til now were said to be a small percentage of Vault cache. 

    If true, Apple is flipping the bird at getting rest of dump if not already in public domain. 

    The Vault contents could already be in the possession of black hats. Apple's statement is high minded but seems to trade risk for ideological purity. 

    Couldnt Apple seek permission from a federal judge to accept dump docs?  Possibly leveraging its news organization, or in a JV with NYT or WAPO or Walt Mossberg, to receive docs with 1st Amdt protections?  Then Apple staffs as consultants to writer could analyze and plug holes before article is published. 
    watto_cobra
  • 'Proton' Mac trojan has Apple code-signing signatures, sold to 'customers' for $50K

    ktappe said:
    r00fus1 said:
    So when is Apple going to revoke the cert? I mean that's why code signing is a requirement, right?
    It's likely Apple doesn't know which of the million certs they've issued is being used here. One way they could find out is to scour their records to try to figure out which cert has lies all over its application, but they might miss it. Another is to buy the thing to get a copy. 

    Wouldn't apple have an idea of the kinds of s/w related to any given developer?  Or the kinds of functionality that the developer might be planning?
    dysamoriasergioz
  • MCX sells one-time Apple Pay challenger CurrentC to JPMorgan Chase

    Soli said:
    cali said:
    Soli said:
    cali said:
    "Chase Pay"

    this is getting ridiculous. 
    I'm fine with that, so long as they all follow suit with the same backend system popularized by Apple Pay, I'm perfectly happy with Android Pay, Samsung Pay, Chase Pay, Swatch Pay, Whitey Will Pay, etc.

    My only concern is that we can eventually move from having to still carry our physical cards with us when a referential card number can used with a digital token to help protect us from potential theft.
    McDonalds Pay
    Microsoft Pay
    Pepsi Pay
    FaceBook Pay
    Wal Mart Pay(oops!)
    NFL Pay

    I hope it stops. Imagine if they make us have separate apps for them all? Then it's the cluttered wallet all over again. 
    I don't understand how you think there will be a McDonald's Pay, Pepsi Pay, etc. The systems already established are for devices, like an Apple device, that uses their SW and HW setup to connect into a financial institution's universal backend design, hence Apple Pay. But not everything is going to run off an Apple device, which then severely limits not only general use, but also makes it less safe for Apple Pay users because they will still have to carry physical cards more often because of the article limitation you suggest.

    I know Tag Heuer unveiled a watch that runs Android Wear so I assume that it will use Android Pay if it contains NFC and other necessary HW, but what about Swatch Group? It looks like the Swatch Bellamy will use a homegrown SW design so why should someone who buys a modernized Swatch Group watch from one of their many brands to include the benefits of a secure, NFC-based payment system on-board? It surely won't be a Apple Pay so what is so wrong with there being Swatch Pay that would allow this functionality? The same for Fitbit and other wrist-worn wearables.
    Bellamy has a 2 year lifespan before its payment authorization expires. I don't know what one must do to renew it. Can't imagine it means replacing the watch, but it seems like a lousy concept. 
    watto_cobra
  • Apple says 'looking into' video of apparent iPhone 7 Plus meltdown

    How long before the Note 8 launches?  Any possibility this is a viral stunt?
    watto_cobradtb200
  • Sprint, T-Mobile merger under consideration again, given change in US regulatory climate

    Large mergers should not be blocked. This myth about preventing monopolies is simply nonsense. Monopolies happen when there is a LACK of competition and too much regulation created to favor Washington connected players, not when there is actual strong market competition. 



    Alternative reality field detected. 
    montrosemacs