mattinoz

Apple doesn't do toys - if they use Generative AI it will be to make tasks happen for the customer. Not just spew a wall of text with buzzwords that align to a topic with no factual regard for the topic. 

After all, that is what a Chatbot do currently, which is why they are loved by marketing and teams. 
It doesn't seem like it is worth Apple's while to try and get to that next benchmark, but there would be a lot of value in helping developers leverage that work to get there. 
Developer tools in AI rumours make sense for Apple. Any feature that is customer-facing will not be branded AI outside of bullet point on a slide with maybe a nice graphic. 

Feels like “consumers” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in this article 

Strange the upsell from 15 to 15pro isn’t very convincing 

robin huber said:

If DOJ is looking for a REAL monopolistic practice involving Apple, look no further than the auto industry. GM has already blocked CarPlay in all its products going forward, and many others have hobbled it—in my new Hyundai I can use it by plugging in my iPhone, but cannot access some other built in features simultaneously. With my old Bolt I can do both, and it’s wireless. Now, they are practicing navigation monopoly. 

or the Telcos who've held up adopting anything like RCS or iMessage with threats using a bunch of low and fringe utility patents. 

jasonfj said:

I wonder why Apple couldn’t have made it a single modifier key. 

because each modifier does its own thing( I've just discovered.)
Shift makes noise when you change volume which is normally a silent operation, Option opens sound control panel. Also good to know