matrix077
About
- Username
- matrix077
- Joined
- Visits
- 71
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,511
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 868
Reactions
-
Apple's Seattle job listings show aggressive hiring for Siri work
dougd said:I don't care how "good" they make Siri I will never use it. Call me old fashioned I dont care -
Apartment & insurance firm sue Apple over lethal iPad fire
-
iPad wins again, Google cancels upcoming tablet products
Wow, I didn’t know Google tablet (running ChromeOS & using Intel - they losing their mind?) is this bad. If you, like me, haven’t followed any news of Google tablet, this video will open your eyes
https://youtu.be/HOh6d_r63Bw
-
Survey finds reliability is the reason workers choose Mac
lkrupp said:deminsd said:lkrupp said:Of course this report will be attacked as invalid by the usual suspects here but it puts all the “gates” and screams of Apple ignoring QA into perspective. In the real world Apple is tops in quality and reliability. If you believe all the crap that is spewed in tech blog comment sections you would think Apple is at the bottom of the barrel in those metrics. Nothing could be further from the truth. The hater narrative is confined to blogs like this one. Only here and in the tech media is Apple constantly doomed or condemned to failure. In the real world people use Apple products and are happy with them.
The way I read it, "a strong preference" is the main reason people buy Mac's. A strong preference? Not reliability or speed or value?
Where's the Windows users opinions? Oh...they didn't ask Windows users.
I use both Mac and Windows, so I'm not a "usual suspect" but give me more than a survey of only Mac users if you're going to do a survey of satisfaction that insinuates a comparison to Windows users. -
Editorial: Axios used old 'embarrassing' IDC data to craft three Apple clickbaits in one d...
gatorguy said:I had heard of Axios but apparently wrongly assumed they were more of a political blog. It's certinly not on my go-to list and prob ably not anyone else's here.
The bigger thing for me is how did Apple News determine that four stories relying on the same source and offering very similar articles were all deserving of a push? Wasn't there a report about Apple using human curators for deciding which articles would get promotion in the News feed? IMO horrid human vetting then if that's true.
The news feed is automatically pulled from your favorite sources and topics and no wonder it’s there, multiple times, because News must know the author love news about Apple.