revolution

This is an extremely well thought out investment. It aligns with Apple's long-term commitment to all things green.  If one wants to reduce pollution due to emerging middle class in china who has a love affair with cars, then the best thing to do is reduce, not the number of cars (which is aspirational) but its daily use. China is a better market for a car on demand than the US.  Other things are also important in terms of use of apple pay and car-play etc. but in the long run, this will benefit the environment in China which everybody should rejoice.

I think it is worth remembering when the touch ID was introduced what the market reaction was!

Over the last four decades nobody thought apple products were that revolutionary, in the beginning. (1)PC (2) Window (3) mouse  and you know the rest.  
Real problem for apple is the relentless pursuit by its imitators which try to bring products before they are ready which explains why Cook is so secretive.

Revolutionary products take time to develop. Secretive does not equate non-innovative.  

Remember Coke has not had second "successful revolutionary product" How about Clorox? Look at their valuation compared to apple.