nubus
IIc, IIe, Plus, SE, SE/30, IIcx, Classic, LC, LC II, LC III, Color Classic, LC 475, Centris 610, PB 180c, Duo 210, Quadra 840AV, PowerMac 7500, Power Computing xxx, PowerMac 4400, PowerMac G3 (Beige), PB 1400, AppleVision 1710AV, Newton MP 120, MP 2000, QuickTake 150, eMate 300, iBook (Tangerine), Pismo (PB G3), MacBook Pro (Core), MacBook Pro 15 (mid-2010), OSX86, iPhone 15 Pro.... and waiting for something insanely great!
Well, it seems Apple Intelligence is insanely great by functionality - not by name. A new golden era.
About
- Username
- nubus
- Joined
- Visits
- 192
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 3,652
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 916
Reactions
-
Brazil wants its piece of the App Store anti-competition fines Apple faces worldwide
rob53 said:These countries are a bunch of cockroaches. They can’t make anything themselves so they simply try forcing Apple to open everything up so they get stuff for free. Apple needs to double the cost of Apple products on every country that tries to sue them. The second thing will be to limit capabilities and/or to not sell to those countries.
China is funding a $80b rail project in Brazil and Peru. A modern Panama Canal. In 5 years the shipping time from Brazil to Shanghai will match that to Los Angeles. While the Chinese are actively taking control over your backyard the US isn't investing in a competing north-south rail link to help US companies. Instead you're giving away tax cuts making it even harder to finance a response. Being shortsighted is not how to win against the Chinese. Keep America relevant!
-
Apple Vision Pro with M5 may arrive before the end of 2025
discountopinion said:Why only update the SoC of a low volume form factor where the SoC is not the main gripe from users?
-
Apple again tries to cut third party app fees to avoid EU fines
ericthehalfbee said:Are you honestly going to say that a company with 20 million customers should be exempt because they’re not big enough? Seriously?
-
Apple again tries to cut third party app fees to avoid EU fines
ericthehalfbee said:Apple should simply drop fees to some ridiculously low level in the EU (5% for small developers, 8% for everyone else). There’d be no reason for any developer to want to roll their own store
As for "what about Sony". The EU DMA regulation requires 45 million active users for companies to be seen as gatekeepers. Sony is at 30-35 million. Doesn't stop other cases to hit Sony. This week a Dutch case on "Sony Tax" hit courts. -
Bipartisan 'Open App Markets Act' resurrected to challenge Apple's App Store control
foregoneconclusion said:Globally, it looks like legislators think App Store commissions are the big bad wolf and crypto/AI are warm, fuzzy bunnies. Bizarre at best.
AI: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng
Crypto: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1114/oj/eng
Would you say that these are fuzzy bunnies compared to the EU DMA?
My take is that the politicians in EU and nationally in the countries at times (often) are regulating rather hard, but then... try to implement Sarbanes–Oxley or other US acts that have a global impact. Staying compliant is part of business.