nubus

IIc, IIe, Plus, SE, SE/30, IIcx, Classic, LC, LC II, LC III, Color Classic, LC 475, Centris 610, PB 180c, Duo 210, Quadra 840AV, PowerMac 7500, Power Computing xxx, PowerMac 4400, PowerMac G3 (Beige), PB 1400, AppleVision 1710AV, Newton MP 120, MP 2000, QuickTake 150, eMate 300, iBook (Tangerine), Pismo (PB G3), MacBook Pro (Core), MacBook Pro 15 (mid-2010), OSX86, iPhone 15 Pro.... and waiting for something insanely great! Well, it seems Apple Intelligence is insanely great by functionality - not by name. A new golden era.

About

Username
nubus
Joined
Visits
192
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
3,673
Badges
2
Posts
915

Reactions

1.1KLike341Dislike368Informative

  • Apple again tries to cut third party app fees to avoid EU fines

    nubusnubus
    9secondkox2 said:
    One of the problems here (excusing the fact that the EU stance on Apple’s business is criminal to begin with) 
    You're saying it is criminal for EU to set the rules for companies operating in EU? Really?
    williamlondon9secondkox2iOS_Guy80ne1shrave10xyzzy01ericthehalfbeemuthuk_vanalingam

  • 'Fortnite' antisteering mandate punishment 'fundamentally unfair' says Apple

    nubusnubus
    Marvin said:
    Apple has a right to charge a commission for directing over 100 million players to an app. Even if 30% of all transactions is too high, it shouldn't be 0%.
    Apple doesn't have any right. Ford can't require for you to use Ford Gas or demand for oil companies to give Ford 30%. Same goes for Apple.

    Even worse... Apple is seen as holding a monopoly on smartphones (feel free to argue, but that is how things stand). Trying to get a share of software sales or making secret APIs to benefit sales of headphones are not OK when you hold a monopoly.
    muthuk_vanalingam

  • 'Fortnite' antisteering mandate punishment 'fundamentally unfair' says Apple

    nubusnubus
    I think both of you have a point. In a free market,..
    It will be far easier to understand what is going on when arguments don't begin with "in a free market".

    There is none. In a free market there would be radiation from headsets, antitrust would be acceptable, and asbestos in baby powder... those parents should have shopped something else. Free markets don't come with regulations like patents or tariffs or consumer protection of any kind.

    Apple will have to adjust to the real world. Preferably before more executives commit perjury.
    muthuk_vanalingamwonkothesane

  • Car makers reject CarPlay Ultra as an Apple overreach

    nubusnubus
    mikethemartian said:
    sflagel said:
    it is ludicrous for a car manufacturer to give Apple access to all its car systems, which will invariably lead to Apple becoming the gatekeeper to the entire tech stack of a car. This in addition to the branding impact. CarPlay is not the end of evolution, for example, the music app is well on CarPlay. Audi music controls are much better. 
    The idea of a company giving control of their product to another company is crazy.
    It made (more) sense when cars were all hardware. Tesla (and CarPlay) changed the game. Now car manufacturers are doing software + hardware + services making it core to the brand experience. With good software the car manufacturers own the entire stack while CarPlay Ultra can only do skinning of hardware from someone else. It does however look pretty.
    williamlondonjib

  • Apple's 'F1' ad in Wallet won't hurt you, but it might save you $10

    nubusnubus
    The legal implications of Apple using special areas of iOS to push movies. This could end in yet another antitrust case.
    We don't need ads in Wallet or for Apple to spend time on legal battles.
    dewmewilliamlondonjibbaconstang