nubus
IIc, IIe, Plus, SE, SE/30, IIcx, Classic, LC, LC II, LC III, Color Classic, LC 475, Centris 610, PB 180c, Duo 210, Quadra 840AV, PowerMac 7500, Power Computing xxx, PowerMac 4400, PowerMac G3 (Beige), PB 1400, AppleVision 1710AV, Newton MP 120, MP 2000, QuickTake 150, eMate 300, iBook (Tangerine), Pismo (PB G3), MacBook Pro (Core), MacBook Pro 15 (mid-2010), OSX86, iPhone 15 Pro.... and waiting for something insanely great!
Well, it seems Apple Intelligence is insanely great by functionality - not by name. A new golden era.
About
- Username
- nubus
- Joined
- Visits
- 193
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 3,645
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 925
Reactions
-
Five years of Apple Silicon: How Apple continues to revolutionize chips
That happened but as fabless we see how Apple now depend on TSMC (and the stability in their region). And it didn't boost iPad or Mac sales to get M-series. Or?bestkeptsecret said:
I think the goal of Apple Silicon was for Apple to not be held hostage by Intel's development cycle.nubus said:Did the change make increase the market share for the Mac? All the "it is fast" and "it uses less energy" are nice but did it really change anything?
-
Five years of Apple Silicon: How Apple continues to revolutionize chips
Did the change make increase the marketshare for the Mac? All the "it is fast" and "it uses less energy" are nice but did it really change anything?
-
Apple EU anti-competition fine is a relatively modest $570 million to avoid Trump retaliat...
You can absolutely disagree with any president, prime minister, dictator,... but safeguards against governments acting as governments? What do you propose?9secondkox2 said:
100%coolfactor said:There also needs to be some safeguards where political regions can't just "change the rules" or implement new rules, and then claim companies are breaking those very same rules. -
Apple EU anti-competition fine is a relatively modest $570 million to avoid Trump retaliat...
I would like to see Apple learn from this. There is no benefit to Apple or any of us in Apple being Tesla-ish in Europe.Wesley_Hilliard said:This fine was a pittance for the affected companies. We'll see where it goes from here.
Apple is taking a beating in US, China, Indonesia,... without complaining in public.
But the relation to EU is toxic with Apple going directly in public after people elected. They only do that in the EU, it clearly doesn't work and never has. Why do it? -
Apple EU anti-competition fine is a relatively modest $570 million to avoid Trump retaliat...
danox said:mikethemartian said:The US federal government forced AT&T to provide its patents (including for the transistor) for free to other US companies.So it would be OK for the current White House occupant to say ASML should give up all of their research and development for competitive reasons. Some poor American company Intel (Spotify) needs in because they have problems keeping up with ASML (Apple)?
Creating a popular product is never a problem. Using the monopoly to enter another market is.
ASML doesn't require for TSMC to use buy wafers only from TSMC and with a 30% tax due to technology. Unlike Apple and well... Tetra Pak (and they got fined as well by the EU).
