Notsofast
About
- Username
- Notsofast
- Joined
- Visits
- 223
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,367
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 450
Reactions
-
Sleep tracking may be coming to Apple Watch soon
22july2013 said:I was so excited when Apple bought Beddit. But how many years ago was that? Nothing has come of it yet, and the rumour is now maybe we'll see something by 2020? -
Judge rules against forcing suspects to unlock phones with Touch ID or Face ID
chasm said:The ruling by this judge is correct and law-abiding, and anyone who thinks otherwise should take their first-ever actual look at the relevant Constitution and related documents. It is all there very plainly: people in America have a right to be secure in the person and papers (the latter of which includes both physical documents and electronic documents), and they must not be forced to incriminate themselves -- and being forced to unlock a device through biometrics (at least) is very clearly forcing exactly that. I'm aware this creates difficulties for law enforcement under certain circumstances, but the Founders correctly reasoned that not making this an ironclad part of the Constitution would invite torture, and they were exactly right. Nothing in the Constitution or Bill of Rights assures law enforcement that they will have access to any tool they might possibly imagine they need to do their job, and indeed directly puts obstacles in the path of law enforcement out of an abundance of caution for the rights of citizens. The avoidance of tyranny and tyrannical tactics such as we're seeing now is very much the point of the document.
As you take your own suggestion to heart and actually study Constitutional law, you'll start to note some problems with your theories, such as the Supreme Court's consistent interpretation that the 5th Amendment prevents the government from compelling you to TESTIFY against yourself. There is no protection against being forced to give up evidence against yourself or even to provide verbal statements that clearly incriminate oneself. That's why the Courts have ruled that you have to give up the most well known biometric- your fingerprints, and that other little biometric known as your DNA, or give a handwriting sample, or a voice sample, etc. That's why you are forced to give up your name, which incriminates thousands of people every day in America because the police then can find out that they are wanted for crimes, etc. Hopefully, this has piqued your interest to learn more about our wonderful Constitution.
-
Study: Apple Pay at 9% adoption in US, lags far behind PayPal and traditional payment meth...
rob53 said:Stores are still shutting off Apple Pay capability even though their POS hardware handles it. Home Depot is a perfect example. Until all POS hardware is forced to accept Apple Pay stores will continue to turn it off. Of course users need to understand what they have and use it.
Unfortunately, there is no way to force merchants to accept Apple Pay. Only thing we can do is keep telling these companies we shop where we can use Apple Pay first, because we prefer the security, privacy and ease of use. -
Study: Apple Pay at 9% adoption in US, lags far behind PayPal and traditional payment meth...
mobird said:I know about all of Wal-Mart's bullshit to deny Pay but what is the reasoning that Home Depot uses? -
Study: Apple Pay at 9% adoption in US, lags far behind PayPal and traditional payment meth...
rob53 said:Stores are still shutting off Apple Pay capability even though their POS hardware handles it. Home Depot is a perfect example. Until all POS hardware is forced to accept Apple Pay stores will continue to turn it off. Of course users need to understand what they have and use it.