zebratrain

Yep true. Unless you know where to look. Just showed you where. You r welcome.

Article writer et al you obviously did not read the articles I referensed; I am still not clear what your credentials are for being steadfast sure you are absolutely and inexplicably right over the current consesus of the scientific community. All I am asking of you is a healthy dose scepticism.

Mr Wuerthele,

A great topic for sure!

There is no overwhelming evidence for or against and it is common knowledge and clear as day that on the effects of RF exposure the science is still out. 

It is important for a discussion such as this here, to have good information and not pompous statements. To that effect please peruse following links to a reputable publication suitable to this discussion:

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.newscientist.com/article/2091065-relax-your-phone-probably-isnt-going-to-give-you-cancer/amp/
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.newscientist.com/article/dn20530-cellphones-are-possibly-carcinogenic/amp/
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.newscientist.com/article/dn25694-wireless-devices-a-health-threat-during-pregnancy/amp/

You would do well to err on the side of caution.

Just remember:
How long had cement been widely used before it was found that cement dust causes cancer?
How long had asbestos been used before it was irrefutable that it causes cancer?
How long did it take WHO to classify cold cuts as a class one carcinogen?

And many more dependant on technology, understanding and circumstance