svanstrom
About
- Username
- svanstrom
- Joined
- Visits
- 71
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,364
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 702
Reactions
-
China sees no reason to keep iPhones if WeChat is banned
macgui said: -
China sees no reason to keep iPhones if WeChat is banned
xiao-zhi said:I stated this here before.WeChat is essential to daily life in China and for Chinese elsewhere, so without it, there really is not need to use an iPhone when there are other choices.
He was simply stating a fact.
Apple can thank Trump for killing it’s second largest market.
I can tell you the switch is already starting, people buying a new phone simply won’t chose an iPhone any longer.
This is not about anti-American sentiment but merely practical necessity .
Americans should understand Mr Trump is ruining the reputation of the USA in the world and if he is re-elected things will turn from bad to worse.Trump’s endless stream of xenophobic and racist rants, and his use of China as a scapegoat to get re-elected has a price, and Apple and other brands are paying the price.
China would probably have been Facebook's second, maybe even first, largest market if they'd been allowed in; same with Google if they'd been allowed to simply be accessed from China.
From that perspective USA has been asleep at the wheel, and has completely missed the mark as far as what to focus on as far as China's position in the world as both a trading and (soft) political force/partner.
Banning apps and killing markets is simply the phrasing you end up with as the world is waking up and making important course corrections; to end up with a more level playing field. -
China sees no reason to keep iPhones if WeChat is banned
jdiamond said:I know this is a basic question, but I haven't seen it answered anywhere:
Can the US president force a US based company to ban an App in a foreign country?
Or can companies do what they feel like outside the US?
I realize a President could always threaten retaliation on behavior they don't like, but can they actually tell Apple "you cannot offer WeChat in the Chinese App Store?
Just curious if anyone knows?
The less simple answer would be: It kinds depends exactly on how the question is phrased, as well as a number of safeguards within the legal system; and so on.
The simple way of looking at it is that what's happening isn't really that The Person In Charge reaches into another country and controls what's going on there; but rather TPIC puts their hand on the shoulder of a local person and says "you can't have people doing [that] in another country". So legally speaking it kinda sorta is more like the power is used to exhort a local outcome; which otherwise would reach into another country.
So, yes, practically speaking it is possible to influence what can and cannot happen in another country simply by controlling the people/companies that otherwise would be controlling these things in that country. -
AirPods share of market shrinks to one-third, down from nearly half in 2019
Alger said:Just the idea that something you're supposed to spend $200+ on can only be used for a couple years, due to short battery life, just makes this purchase option seem idiotic, unless money is no object.
(Money/value is definitely something that I consider purchasing anything; and the AirPods Pro simply are worth it to me, as a professional tool.) -
AirPods share of market shrinks to one-third, down from nearly half in 2019