KITA

About

Username
KITA
Joined
Visits
127
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
1,479
Badges
0
Posts
410
  • Stop us if you've heard this before: There's a new Apple Silicon killer in town

    Here's an initial performance per watt comparison using the Ryzen Z1 Extreme (equivalent to the 7840u, but targeted to handhelds) in the ASUS ROG Ally Z1 Extreme.



    ASUS ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Specifications:

    AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
    16 GB LPDDR5-6400 (Dual-Channel)
    512 GB NVMe PCIe 4.0

    Devices:

    ASUS ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Z1 Extreme)
    Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 (M2)

    Power consumption comparison using Cinebench R15 / Multi 64Bit (looped):

    Z1 Extreme: 2397 @ 53 Watts [Turbo Mode (plugged in) setting] = 45 Points / Watt
    Z1 Extreme: 2153 @ 35 Watts [Turbo Mode (battery) setting] = 61 Points / Watt
    Z1 Extreme: 1727 @ 25 Watts [Performance Mode setting] = 69 Points / Watt
    Z1 Extreme: 1180 @ 17 Watts [Quiet Mode setting] = 69 Points / Watt
    M2: 1229 @ 19 Watts = 64 Points / Watt

    Source: Notebookcheck

    EDIT: Fixed link

    EDIT 2: Important detail...

    I should add, the TDP values I used in those numbers are based on this:

    Power ModeQuietPerformanceTurbo/with PSUManual/with PSU
    SoC SPL (= PL1)9 Watts15 Watts25 / 30 Watts15 / 30 Watts
    SoC sPPT (= PL2)14 Watts20 Watts30 / 43 Watts20 / 43 Watts
    SoC fPPT (= PL4)17 Watts25 Watts35 / 53 Watts25 / 53 Watts

    fPPT being the peak for that setting (very short bursts), so the actual sustained Watts would be lower than the numbers I used in my calculations for each power setting's score. Meaning, the real Points / Watt should be even higher.
    bala1234muthuk_vanalingam
  • Samsung Galaxy S23 vs iPhone 14 Pro - compared

    Summary for me is that Apple clearly maintains the silicon design crown with a huge margin. Outperforming snapdragon which has double the performance cores is incredible.
    What? The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 has only one high performance "Prime" core, which is still smaller than one of Apple's high performance cores.

    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 tra 32 bit e 64 bit  Hardware Upgrade
    • 1x Cortex X3
    • 2x Cortex A715
    • 2x Cortex A710
    • 3x Cortex A510
    I'd also note, the processor in the S23 isn't a standard "Snapdragon 8 Gen 2", it's a higher binned chip, the "Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy" which also has higher clock speeds.

    Snapdragon 8 Gen 2:
    • CPU @ 3.2 GHz
    • GPU @ 680 MHz
    Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy:
    • CPU @ 3.35 GHz
    • GPU @ 720 MHz
    Qualcomm is still using stock ARM cores, their NUVIA cores have yet to make their debut.

    In terms of GPU, the non-Galaxy Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is already ahead of the A16, so not much needs to be said there:




    muthuk_vanalingam
  • Qualcomm aims to take on Apple Silicon in nine months

    Just so everyone is aware, if NUVIA's performance claims are true (keep in mind the big "if"), then Qualcomm will be ahead of the M1 and more likely in a position to compete with an M2 series chip:



    Given the reputation of the engineers behind NUVIA and the fact that Qualcomm paid a relatively significant sum for them to fill this exact need, it does give their claim some merit. So don't be surprised if it does end up competing with Apple's late 2022 / early 2023 offerings.

    Once again though, we still have yet to see an actual product, so take this with a grain of salt until we do.
    GG1muthuk_vanalingamwilliamlondon
  • Intel to outpace Moore's Law, surpass rivals in 2025, CEO says

    Intel has had so many delays and setbacks, it's just hard to trust these types of claim. It's obvious that they have a lot of talent and capabilities, but their business operation has had them drag their feet until it was far too late. Foundry issues have also been a big part of their undoing. It's amazing how far behind they were on getting their 10 nm out the door. They've been known to have a few aces up their sleeve in the past, but it's just not so clear that will be the case this time around.

    lkrupp said:
    Anyone notice how the Intel apologists have come out of the woodwork in these forums? The M1 Max must really have their full attention these days.
    Bold words by you considering you wear the crown for being the King (or Queen) of Apple apologists even when it isn't warranted.  And I don't mean that in a positive way.
    Ikrupp's posts are nothing short of cancerous with nothing of value to add to any discussion. The only aim of his posts are to promote hatred and divide among readers and members here.

    Absolute poison.
    muthuk_vanalingamwilliamlondon
  • Compared: 2021 16-inch MacBook Pro vs Dell XPS 17


    Specifications

    16-inch MacBook Pro (2021)Dell XPS 17 (2021)



    Just a note, the model listed in this article is the original 2020 model (10th gen + RTX 2060).

    The later reference to the fully spec'd version is the actual 2021 XPS 17 (11th gen + RTX 3060).
    entropysFileMakerFellerdewme